Internal clock speed-up

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that the company's INTERNAL PACE OF OPERATING HAS MATERIALLY ACCELERATED — that the organization is now deciding, building, shipping, hiring, launching, or executing on a faster clock than it used to run on — and does management present this speed-up as a real, already-observable change in how the company works rather than as a goal or slogan? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent change: the tempo at which the company itself operates has stepped up and is visible now — for example, management describing decision cycles or approval layers that have been compressed; product, clinical, or engineering milestones being reached sooner than the company's own historical norm; launch, release, construction, or rollout cadences that have quickened; hiring, onboarding, or deployment happening at a pace the company previously could not sustain; the organization moving from annual or multi-year rhythms to quarterly or monthly ones; or management explicitly contrasting how fast the company executes now versus how it operated before, and treating that contrast as a durable change in the company's metabolism rather than a one-off sprint. What matters is the described step-change in the company's own operating speed, grounded in things already happening, not ordinary urgency language, not a single rushed project, and not a promise to move faster later. Answer NO if management simply reports strong results, high activity, or a busy quarter without describing any change in the pace at which the company itself operates. NO if the speed-up is only aspirational, planned, or framed as something the company needs to achieve rather than something already underway. NO if the only acceleration described is external — customers buying faster, the market moving faster, or demand arriving sooner — with no claim that the company's own execution cadence has changed. NO if faster timelines are attributed to a one-time event, a temporary surge of effort, or normal seasonality. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.