Named counterparty roster suddenly upgraded in caliber

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that the CALIBER OF COUNTERPARTIES NOW DOING REAL BUSINESS WITH THE COMPANY HAS RECENTLY STEPPED UP — that customers, partners, or institutions of a size, stature, or sophistication the company did not previously transact with are NOW actually buying, deploying, contracting, or committing — and does management present this upgraded roster as a recent change grounded in current transactions, with the associated business still early relative to what those relationships imply? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent development with all three present: (1) A CALIBER SHIFT, RECENTLY OCCURRED: management conveys — by naming counterparties, by describing their category unmistakably ('one of the largest X', 'a national system', 'a top-tier operator'), or by contrasting who buys now versus who used to — that the company has recently begun transacting with a visibly higher class of counterparty than its historical norm; (2) REAL CURRENT BUSINESS, NOT LOGOS: these upgraded counterparties are actually paying, ordering, deploying, or committing now, described with operating substance, not letters of intent, pilots without payment, or pipeline; and (3) EARLY RELATIVE TO THE RELATIONSHIP: management conveys that what these counterparties have taken so far is the beginning — initial orders, first phases, first deployments — with the fuller relationship still ahead of the reported results. Answer NO if the counterparties described are the same kinds the company has always served. NO if the higher-caliber parties are only prospects, in discussions, or unpaid evaluations. NO if the company is itself large so that big counterparties are unremarkable for it. NO if the relationships are mature and fully reflected in results. NO if the upgrade rests on one anecdote management treats as exceptional. NO if the caliber shift appears only in analyst flattery management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.