Named temporary drag with a stated expiration

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management identify a SPECIFIC, NAMEABLE BURDEN that is depressing the company's current reported results — a cost, drag, disruption, or headwind that management itself points to and explains — AND does management convey that this burden is TEMPORARY AND ALREADY ON ITS WAY OUT, with a stated or clearly implied timeline over the coming quarters, such that the underlying business is presented as performing better than the reported numbers show? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent situation with both halves present: (1) A NAMED, IDENTIFIABLE DRAG ON CURRENT RESULTS. Management points to a specific thing that is weighing on the numbers just reported and explains what it is — for example: startup or ramp costs of a new facility, product, or program running before the associated revenue; costs being duplicated during a transition, consolidation, migration, or relocation; an unprofitable contract, product line, or commitment being worked off or wound down; a disruption, outage, recall, or integration whose costs are being absorbed now; customers working down excess inventory before ordering normally again; a launch, regulatory, or compliance expense that is front-loaded; or another concrete burden management names and sizes in its own account of the period. The drag may take whatever form fits the industry, but it must be identified by management as a distinct thing — not merely 'a challenging environment' or 'macro headwinds.' (2) MANAGEMENT PRESENTS THE DRAG AS FINITE AND ALREADY FADING, ON A VISIBLE TIMELINE. Management conveys that this burden ends: it is expected to diminish, roll off, be completed, be lapped, or normalize within roughly the coming year, with the timing largely within the company's visibility or control — and management indicates the fade has already begun or the end is concretely scheduled (a completion date, a contract expiry, a ramp reaching scale, a transition finishing, the peak of the cost already passed). Management should convey — directly or plainly in substance — that as this burden lifts, results are expected to look meaningfully better without requiring any new business the company does not already have. The essence is ONE phenomenon: the reported numbers are carrying a weight that management says is temporary and already lifting, so the current results understate the business that will remain once it is gone. Answer NO if the weakness is attributed mainly to demand, competition, pricing, macroeconomics, weather, FX, or industry conditions whose end is outside the company's visibility. NO if the drag is described but presented as ongoing, structural, or with no stated or implied end period. NO if the 'temporary' framing is only a hope that conditions improve, without a specific burden that expires. NO if the company is performing well and the discussion of costs is routine expense management with no meaningful weight on reported results. NO if the improvement depends chiefly on winning new business, a recovery in demand, or events not yet secured. NO if the drag and its timeline appear only in an analyst's question or model that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.