New normal declared and staffed

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that the LEVEL OF BUSINESS THE COMPANY IS NOW DOING HAS BECOME ITS NEW NORMAL — that activity which would recently have been exceptional for this company (in size, volume, scale of customers, pace of orders, or scope of work) is now presented by management as the company's current ordinary operating level — AND is management describing real, present-tense work to serve and continue that higher level rather than treating it as a spike? Answer YES when management's own words convey BOTH halves of this one phenomenon, in whatever form fits the business: (1) A HIGHER LEVEL, ALREADY REAL, FRAMED AS THE NEW BASELINE. Management describes current activity — actual orders, customers, volumes, output, contracts, utilization, deployments, or work in hand from the recent period — at a level that management itself indicates is above what was recently usual for this company, and speaks about that higher level as where the business now operates: for example, noting that what used to be a large order or rare win for the company is now arriving regularly; that current run-rates, activity, or commitments have stepped up from the company's recent norm and are being sustained; that the company is now routinely doing business of a kind or size it seldom did before; or otherwise treating the recent step-up as the company's present working level rather than a one-time event. The comparison must be against the company's OWN recent experience, and the higher level must rest on business that has actually happened or is actually in hand — not on forecasts, pipeline, or market opportunity. (2) THE COMPANY IS OPERATING TO THAT LEVEL NOW. Management describes what the company is presently doing to serve, deliver, staff, supply, or extend that higher level — such as capacity, people, production, inventory, systems, or organization being added or already in place for it, delivery and ramp work underway, or plans and resources now set against the higher level — conveying that management expects the elevated level to continue and is running the company accordingly, with more of its effect still ahead of the reported results. Answer NO if the strong period is presented as an ordinary good quarter within the company's usual range, with no indication that the company's working level has shifted. NO if management itself attributes the step-up mainly to a one-time event, a single exceptional deal, catch-up, pull-forward, seasonality, or a temporary condition it expects to unwind. NO if the higher level is only forecast, targeted, or hoped for rather than already being done. NO if management treats the elevated activity as a peak to come down from, or is chiefly defending weak or declining results. NO if there is no described present-tense work to serve or continue the higher level. NO if the new-normal framing appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.