Newly elevated priority replacing old playbook

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management explicitly state that it has CHANGED what the company is primarily optimizing for — that a specific goal, metric, or constraint now ranks first, displacing a different priority that guided the company before? Answer YES only if management, in its own words anywhere on the call (prepared remarks or Q&A), clearly conveys BOTH of the following: (1) a named current top priority or governing objective (for example: free cash flow generation, profitable growth rather than growth at any cost, capacity discipline, returns on capital, balance-sheet strength, service levels, or share in a specific segment), and (2) an explicit contrast with the company's own prior emphasis — such as "we used to prioritize X, now we are prioritizing Y," "the focus has shifted from X to Y," "we are no longer willing to do X to get growth," or an explanation that a recent decision was made BECAUSE of this reordering of priorities. The shift must be described as a deliberate change in the company's own operating stance, already reflected in at least one concrete decision, trade-off, or resource choice mentioned on the call. Answer NO if management only lists current priorities or initiatives with no contrast to a prior emphasis; NO if the change is attributed solely to external conditions forcing a reaction (macro, regulation, a customer demand) with no claim of a deliberate internal reordering; NO if the "shift" is only a routine continuation of a long-standing strategy; NO if it is purely aspirational language ("we intend to focus more on...") with no decision or trade-off already taken; and NO if only an analyst characterizes a strategic change and management does not itself confirm the reordering. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.