Order book stretching past the horizon

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that the company's VISIBILITY INTO ITS OWN FUTURE HAS LENGTHENED IN A STEP-CHANGE WAY — that customers, counterparties, or partners are now committing to the company over far longer horizons than this business was previously able to see or plan against — and does management treat that lengthened horizon as changing how they run and think about the company? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent development: the period of demand the company can already count on has extended well beyond its historical norm, so that a meaningful part of the company's future work, volume, or revenue is effectively spoken for before it happens. This can appear in many forms — an order book, backlog, pipeline of committed work, or contracted position that management describes as reaching further out in time than it used to; customers signing longer-dated or multi-period commitments where they previously bought short-term or spot; capacity, output, slots, or availability described as reserved or claimed well into future periods; management saying they now have visibility measured in years rather than quarters, or that they can see further ahead than at any point in the company's history; a shift from quoting or bidding transactionally to holding long-duration committed positions. What matters is the DURATION of what is already committed, not the size of one quarter's orders. Management should present this as a current, already-established fact about the company's committed position — and should convey that it matters, for example by saying it lets them invest, add capacity, hire, plan production, or make decisions they previously could not make with confidence. Answer NO if management simply reports a strong quarter, a healthy pipeline, a growing backlog, or good bookings without conveying that the TIME HORIZON of committed demand has genuinely lengthened beyond what is normal for this business. NO if the long-dated commitments are only being negotiated, hoped for, or expected to come. NO if long-duration contracts are simply the ordinary structure of the industry and nothing has changed about how far out the company can see. NO if the extended visibility is described as coming purely from customers stockpiling, double-ordering, or hedging a temporary shortage that management expects to unwind. NO if management is chiefly discussing shrinking visibility, order deferrals, cancellations, or shortened customer commitments. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.