Quarter of firsts: the period's story is built from first-time events the company has never done before, now…

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, is management's account of the just-reported period built substantially around FIRST-TIME EVENTS — real things the company actually did or achieved in or around this period that, in management's own telling, the company had NEVER DONE BEFORE — with management treating these firsts not as curiosities but as the OPENING INSTANCES of activity that is now beginning to repeat or scale? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent pattern with BOTH halves present: (1) GENUINE FIRSTS, ALREADY ACCOMPLISHED, CARRYING THE STORY. Management describes at least TWO distinct first-time events from the recent period or the weeks around it — things done, not planned — and marks them, directly or plainly in substance, as new territory for THIS company: for example, a first commercial sale, shipment, delivery, or deployment of an offering; a first customer of a new kind, size, or market; a first facility, site, location, or capacity brought into operation; a first entry into a geography, channel, or application now transacting; a first period in which a product, unit, or operation reached a level it had never reached; or another concrete first that fits the industry. The firsts must be REAL AND CURRENT — actually occurred, with operating substance behind them — and must be prominent in how management tells the period's story rather than mentioned in passing. (2) THE FIRSTS ARE PRESENTED AS BEGINNINGS, WITH REPETITION ALREADY FORMING. Management conveys, in its own voice, that these first instances are the front of something continuing: the second and further instances of the same kind are already happening, already committed, already scheduled, or visibly forming now — follow-on orders behind the first order, additional customers behind the first customer, further sites behind the first site, continued output behind the first output — so that the reported results contain only the earliest portion of what these firsts have started, with the larger contribution still ahead. Answer NO if the call is a routine period at an established business with no meaningful first-time events in management's own telling. NO if only one first is described, or the firsts are trivial housekeeping items management itself treats as immaterial. NO if the "firsts" are still plans, pipeline, pilots without real transactions, or contingent on approvals, financing, or decisions not yet made. NO if management presents the firsts as one-off occurrences with nothing of the same kind forming behind them. NO if the repetition is expressed only as hope, market size, or generic optimism rather than as activity already occurring, committed, or visibly forming. NO if the first-time framing appears only in an analyst's question or summary that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.