Room to raise the ceiling

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that the company is currently charging LESS for what it sells than the market would presently bear — that its own prices, rates, fees, or terms sit meaningfully below the value customers are getting or below what the current market would support — AND that the company has already begun, or is now actively beginning, to close that gap while customers stay? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent situation: management itself identifies a gap between what the company charges and what its offering is now worth to customers, and describes real movement to narrow it that is already in motion. Any genuine expression of this counts, and the form varies widely across industries. For example — management saying its prices are below market, below competitors, below replacement cost, or below the value the product delivers, and that it is now raising them; management describing legacy, grandfathered, or older agreements being reset toward current levels as they come up; management noting it has been undercharging relative to what customers save, earn, or achieve by using the product, and is now capturing more of that; management describing discounting being pulled back, terms being tightened, or mix shifting toward better-priced business because it can; or management explaining that recent attempts to charge more have met little resistance, so it is going further. Two things should come through in management's own voice. First, THE GAP IS MANAGEMENT'S OWN CLAIM ABOUT ITS OWN PRICING — not an analyst's observation, and not simply that market prices happened to rise; management indicates the company has been leaving money on the table relative to what its offering is worth today. Second, THE CLOSING OF THE GAP IS REAL AND CURRENT — price or term improvements already being taken, already being accepted by customers, or already scheduled into the company's own book as it resets — not merely an intention to consider pricing someday, and not merely a hope that market prices will rise. Answer NO if the higher pricing described is chiefly passing through the company's own cost increases — inflation, wages, freight, materials, energy, tariffs, or currency — since that is cost recovery, not a discovered gap between price and value. NO if the pricing improvement is entirely an industry-wide or commodity-market move the company passively receives, with no claim that the company itself had been undercharging. NO if management is chiefly defending price against pressure, describing discounting it had to give, or explaining price competition. NO if better pricing is only planned, targeted, hoped for, or expected from future market conditions rather than already being taken or already scheduled. NO if management merely asserts generically that it "has pricing power," "adds tremendous value," or "will monetize over time" without conveying that its current charges sit below what the market would bear and that it is now moving to close that gap. NO if the only evidence is a single isolated price action with no broader claim about the company's pricing sitting below value. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.