Second engine igniting off the first

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that a SECOND, DISTINCT WAY OF MAKING MONEY has recently emerged FROM the company's existing operations, assets, customers, or capabilities - an additional revenue avenue that grew out of what the company already does rather than a separate diversification - AND that this second avenue is ALREADY GENERATING REAL PAYING BUSINESS today while management is now deliberately putting effort or resources behind growing it? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent phenomenon with both halves present as a present-tense reality: (1) A SECOND EARNING AVENUE THAT GREW OUT OF THE FIRST. Management identifies an additional, distinguishable stream of business that arose from something the company already built or does - for example: monetizing a capability, technology, process, data, byproduct, or infrastructure that was originally created to serve the core business; the company's existing product or asset base opening a different kind of revenue (services on an installed base, licensing what it developed for itself, selling to a different side of its market, a spin-out offering born from internal tools, a byproduct or secondary output now being sold in its own right); or an offering originally built for one purpose now being sold as its own line of business. What matters is the ORIGIN - the second avenue leverages what already exists inside the company - and the DISTINCTNESS - management talks about it as its own stream of business, not just more sales of the same thing to the same buyers. (2) IT IS PAYING TODAY AND BEING FED. Management indicates that this second avenue is already producing real current revenue, orders, contracts, or paying customers in the recent period - actual money changing hands now, however small relative to the core - AND describes deliberate current effort to grow it: dedicating people, investment, capacity, or organizational focus to it; signing further deals in it; building it out; or explicitly treating it as a growth avenue the company is now pursuing on purpose. Answer NO if the company describes only one way of making money, however strong or fast-growing. NO if the additional avenue is only an idea, plan, pilot without paying customers, or an opportunity management says it could pursue someday. NO if the 'second stream' is ordinary cross-selling, upselling, product-line extensions, or new versions sold to the same customers in the same basic way. NO if the second business came chiefly from acquiring an unrelated company rather than emerging from the company's own operations. NO if management mentions the additional stream only in passing without conveying that it is real, paying, and being deliberately grown. NO if the company is a conglomerate or multi-segment business simply reporting its usual several segments. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.