Second proving already underway

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that the company is CURRENTLY REPEATING, ON PURPOSE, SOMETHING IT HAS ALREADY SUCCEEDED AT ONCE — that is, management conveys that a specific thing the company has already proven it can do (build a site, launch a product, enter a market, stand up a facility, win a type of customer, execute a program, develop an asset, or carry out some other identifiable undertaking) is now being done AGAIN in a new instance, and that this second-or-later instance is already showing real signs of working? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent phenomenon with all three of the following coming through as a present-tense reality: (1) A PROVEN FIRST TIME THAT MANAGEMENT POINTS BACK TO. Management refers to something specific the company has already accomplished and treats it as demonstrated capability — the first plant that reached target economics, the first product that found its market, the first region that worked, the first program that delivered, the first cohort of customers that behaved as hoped. Management need not call it "the first"; what matters is that management grounds the current effort in an earlier success of the SAME KIND, conveying "we have done this before and it worked." (2) A REPETITION NOW IN MOTION, ALREADY PRODUCING SOMETHING REAL. Management describes the next instance of that same thing actually being built, launched, opened, ramped, or run right now — and already generating observable results: first output, first customers, first orders, early economics, early adoption, initial volumes, or early performance that management can point to as evidence the repeat is taking hold. The repetition must be more than announced or planned: it must be physically or commercially underway with something already to show for it, however early. (3) MANAGEMENT TREATS THE REPEATABILITY AS THE POINT. Management conveys, directly or plainly in substance, that what is being proven now is not the thing itself but the company's ability to do it again and again — that the second instance de-risks the third, that the process is now understood, that each repetition gets easier, faster, or cheaper, or that the company's future is a matter of multiplying something already proven rather than inventing something new. Management should also convey that the repetition is still early relative to where it can go, so the reported results reflect only the beginning of the multiplying. The essence is ONE phenomenon: a company that has crossed from "can we do this?" to "watch us do it again," with the second proof already running. The industry, the thing being repeated, and the form of the early evidence may vary widely. Answer NO if the company is doing something for the FIRST time, with no earlier success of the same kind to point back to. NO if the repetition is only planned, announced, contemplated, or contingent on financing, approvals, or decisions not yet obtained, with nothing yet underway. NO if the new instance exists but management points to nothing yet showing it is working. NO if the company is simply continuing to operate its existing single business well, with no new instance of a proven undertaking being stood up. NO if the repetition is the routine, perpetual cadence of a business that has always added similar units at a steady pace (ordinary annual openings, standard product refreshes, regular account additions) with no sense that management is presenting a newly demonstrated repeatability. NO if the earlier "success" is in a different kind of undertaking, so the current effort is not a repeat of something proven. NO if management is chiefly explaining that the repeat is struggling, delayed, or underperforming the original. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.