Tempo shift: the rhythm of the business has visibly quickened, and management ties it to real current activity

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that the RHYTHM OF THE BUSINESS HAS RECENTLY QUICKENED — that things which used to take the company or its counterparties a long time are now happening noticeably faster — and does management ground this quickening in real, current activity rather than in hopes or plans? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, that the pace at which business gets done has stepped up recently, and that this faster pace is visible in things actually happening now. The quickening may show up on EITHER side of the company's dealings, and any genuine expression of it counts — for example: customers or counterparties deciding, committing, signing, ordering, adopting, or expanding more quickly than they used to, with less deliberation, shorter evaluations, or fewer delays; deals, projects, approvals, openings, launches, installations, ramps, or conversions completing in less time than the company's own recent norm; work or demand arriving sooner than expected, with timelines being pulled forward rather than pushed back; the company itself now moving through its own steps — building, hiring, shipping, onboarding, launching — at a faster cadence than before, in response to what is in front of it; or management describing that the interval between winning business and delivering it, or between starting something and seeing results from it, has visibly shortened. What matters is the CHANGE IN TEMPO relative to how this business normally moves, presented by management as something already being experienced in current dealings, orders, projects, or operations — with at least some concrete grounding in recent events — and treated as meaningful to where the company is heading rather than mentioned in passing. Answer NO if management describes only strong demand, good results, or a busy period without conveying that anything is happening FASTER than it used to. Answer NO if the faster pace is only hoped for, targeted, or promised for the future rather than already being experienced. Answer NO if the acceleration is attributed by management chiefly to a one-time deadline, a pre-buy ahead of a price increase, a temporary catch-up after a disruption, or ordinary seasonality it expects to unwind. Answer NO if timelines are described as lengthening, slipping, or being pushed out. Answer NO if the quickening is asserted only in generic language ("we are moving with urgency," "momentum is accelerating") with no concrete current activity behind it. Answer NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.