Question Bank › Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity: both new counterparties arriving and existing ones enlarging in the same recent period

Calls Tested
496
Answered YES
88
Hit Rate
17.7%
rare by design

Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) — this company's answers

NO on the Q2 2021 call 2021-08-01 C+
The model's full reasoning — Q2 2021 call → NO我们需要仔细分析 transcript 中管理层的描述,判断是否同时满足两个方向:新客户/合作伙伴/项目实际到来,以及现有客户/关系扩大规模/承诺。且管理层将其描述为已发生的当前模式。 首先阅读 transcript 相关部分。Herve Sedky 提到: - 第二季度结果仍受疫情影响,但两个小型展会(ASD Market Week Southeast in Orlando 和 Digital Dealer in Tampa)展示了客户回归的热情。Digital Dealer 的出席率达到疫情前的65%,Net Promoter Score 显著提高,下一届的 pacing 更强。这算是现有客户?还是新客户?这里没有明确区分新老客户,只是提到展会表现。 - 提到 Prosper Show 在拉斯维加斯举办,基本与2019年持平,预期明年强劲。这算是现有? - 关键在于是否有“新客户/合作伙伴/项目实际签约”的描述。Herve 提到收购 Sue Bryce Education(4月),以及战略合作与 Comexposium 推出 SIAL America(明年3月)。这些是新的项目/合作伙伴,但属于公司层面的投资/合作,不是“客户”意义上的新签约。而且 SIAL America 是明年才推出,不算“近期实际发生”。 - PlumRiver 的 ElasticSuite 平台,“more than double the number of new client wins as compared to this point last year”——这里明确提到新客户赢单数量翻倍,这是新客户的实际到来。这是真实事件,不是 pipeline。 - 关于现有客户扩大:有没有提到现有客户扩大订单或承诺?Herve 提到“pacing”对于2022年第一季度事件“pacing much closer, although still below pre-COVID levels”,这说明未来预订情况,但这是展望,不是当前已发生的。另外提到“customers’ clear enthusiasm for returning to live events”和“Net Promoter Score”提高,但未具体说现有客户增加订单量。 - 在第二季度结果部分,提到收入增加由于小型展会、印刷和数字广告收入以及新的虚拟产品。但未明确区分新老客户。 David Doft 部分:提到 deferred revenue 从 $48.6 million 增加到 $119.2 million,这反映了客户定金增加,这可能表示客户预订增加,但不确定是新客户还是现有客户扩大。但 deferred revenue 增加是事实,表明订单/承诺增加。这可能是现有客户预订未来展会,也可能是新客户,但未细分。 关键:管理层是否明确描述了“新客户到来”和“现有客户扩大”这两个方面,并将其作为当前模式?PlumRiver 的新客户赢单是明确的“新客户”,但这是数字平台业务,不是核心展会业务。而展会业务方面,是否提到现有客户扩大?例如,Herve 提到“Digital Dealer show... 下一届 pacing 更强”,这暗示现有客户(或参展商)预订下一届更多?但没有明确说“现有客户增加了他们的订单”。 另外,关于“existing counterparties enlarged what they take”,可能指参展商增加了展位面积或数量?没有明确提到。 管理层主要强调的是活动重新开始,但未明确说“现有客户扩大”与“新客户到来”同时发生。PlumRiver 的新客户是独立的,与展会客户不同。而且整体上,管理层承认 attendance 低于疫情前,更多在谈未来恢复。 因此,可能只满足了一半(新客户在 PlumRiver 上),而现有客户扩大缺乏具体描述。或者可以认为 deferred revenue 增加代表现有客户和新客户都有,但无法区分。更关键的是,管理层没有明确将“新客户到来”和“现有客户扩大”作为同时发生的当前模式。他们更多强调的是活动恢复和未来展望。 所以答案应为 NO。

← Back to the full EEX analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that in the RECENT PERIOD the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once — (1) NEW paying counterparties actually arrived: fresh customers, accounts, partners, or programs that actually signed, ordered, or began transacting in the recent period, described as real events rather than pipeline; AND (2) EXISTING counterparties enlarged what they take: accounts or relationships the company already had that visibly stepped up their orders, scope, volumes, sites, usage, or commitments in the same recent period, by the counterparty's own choice rather than through price increases alone — with management presenting this two-sided build as an observed, current pattern that is meaningful to where the company is heading? Answer YES when management's own words convey both halves as already-occurring facts of the recent period, in whatever form fits the industry, grounded in real activity (actual signings, orders, deployments, volumes, or usage) rather than hopes, and management treats the combination — widening and deepening together — as characterizing the business now, with more of both still forming. Answer NO if only one side is present — new wins without existing relationships growing, or expansion within the base without new arrivals. NO if either side is described only through pipeline, interest, plans, or projections. NO if the pattern rests on a single large deal, seasonal catch-up, restocking, or a condition management expects to fade. NO if the growth described is chiefly price increases pushed onto unchanged volumes. NO if the two-sided framing appears only in an analyst's question or summary that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
WRBY Warby Parker Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-09 A
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Q1 2024 2024-05-06 B+
SNV Synovus Financial Corp. Q1 2024 2024-04-18 B
PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Q4 2023 2024-03-08 D
NICE NICE Ltd. Q4 2023 2024-02-22 B+
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado Q3 2023 2023-11-10 C+
DASH DoorDash, Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 C+
BZUN Baozun Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-28 D
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited Q2 2023 2023-08-18 C+
SPT Sprout Social, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-04 B+
PERI Perion Network Ltd. Q2 2023 2023-08-02 A
IMAX IMAX Corporation Q2 2023 2023-07-26 B+
PFIE Profire Energy, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-13 B
SPIR Spire Global, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-10 B
CALX Calix, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-04-20 C+
TACT TransAct Technologies Incorporated Q4 2022 2023-03-08 A
DKS DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-03-07 B
TOST Toast, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-16 C+
ADPT Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-14 C+
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-08 B
CNA CNA Financial Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-06 B
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
MEC Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-05 B+
SYY Sysco Corporation Q1 2023 2022-11-01 C+
KEY KeyCorp Q3 2022 2022-10-20 B+
TMCI Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-13 B+
EVGO EVgo, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-09 C+
DM Desktop Metal, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-08 F
FLR Fluor Corporation Q2 2022 2022-08-05 D
IT Gartner, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-02 A
UPWK Upwork Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 C+
CME CME Group Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 B
OGI OrganiGram Holdings Inc. Q3 2022 2022-07-14 B+
SE Sea Limited Q1 2022 2022-05-17 F
FLYW Flywire Corporation Q1 2022 2022-05-14 B+
ZVIA Zevia PBC Q1 2022 2022-05-12 B
OPK OPKO Health, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-09 D
BXP Boston Properties, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-03 A
CNXC Concentrix Corporation Q1 2022 2022-03-30 B
ZENV Zenvia Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-17 C+
SOPH SOPHiA GENETICS SA Q4 2021 2022-03-15 C
RELY Remitly Global, Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-02 B
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-02-10 D
GTES Gates Industrial Corporation plc Q4 2021 2022-02-07 C+
OOMA Ooma, Inc. Q3 2022 2021-12-02 B+
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 A
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 B+
IRBT iRobot Corporation Q3 2021 2021-10-28 D
ASAN Asana, Inc. Q2 2022 2021-09-01 B+
TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-08-18 C
UFI Unifi, Inc. Q4 2021 2021-08-07 B
TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-27 A
TCBI Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-21 F
CMTL Comtech Telecommunications Corp. Q1 2019 2018-12-07 B+
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. Q3 2019 2018-11-20 A
OGE OGE Energy Corp. Q3 2018 2018-11-08 A
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-07-26 A
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Q2 2018 2018-07-19 B+
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated Q2 2018 2018-06-28 C+
SATS EchoStar Corporation Q1 2018 2018-05-10 C+
BCOV Brightcove Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ALLY Ally Financial Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ILMN Illumina, Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-24 A
UPLD Upland Software, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-03-08 C+
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-02-16 B
DLHC DLH Holdings Corp. Q1 2018 2018-02-06 C+
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Q4 2017 2018-01-16 A
MITK Mitek Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-07 C+
MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-25 C+
SBFG SB Financial Group, Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-20 A
GNTX Gentex Corporation Q3 2017 2017-10-20 B
BCE BCE Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-05 B+
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
FLEX Flex Ltd. Q1 2018 2017-07-28 F
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated Q2 2017 2017-06-08 B
IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-09 C
ICFI ICF International, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-06 B+
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation Q1 2017 2017-02-08 A
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp Q4 2016 2017-01-24 B+
WYY WidePoint Corporation Q3 2016 2016-11-09 D
BCH Banco de Chile Q3 2016 2016-10-30 B+
ULBI Ultralife Corporation Q3 2016 2016-10-29 C+
MAT Mattel, Inc. Q3 2016 2016-10-19 C
VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. Q2 2016 2016-08-09 B+
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+
WK Workiva Inc. Q4 2015 2016-03-01 B
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-25 C

How the model reasoned

PFIE · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management describes intensification from BOTH new paying counterparties AND existing ones enlarging what they take, in the recent period, as observed facts. YES Management describes both new arrivals ("new customers," "new opportunities," "several project opportunities," "notable customers" including specific ones like Equitrans Midstream and Enterprise Products) and existing-customer expansion ("repeat orders," "repeat business," "repeat orders from one of the United States’ largest producers," " 85,000 burner management solutions," "large uptick... on retrofits") as already-completed facts in the recent period. They present the combination—widening the customer base while deepening relationships—as the current observed pattern driving the business forward.
EPAM · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both sides occurring together in the recent period: new engagements with clients (including specific examples like the European multinational and Global Health Services Company that started less than 12 months ago) alongside growth within the top 20 existing accounts (more than 18% year-over-year) and even stronger growth outside those 20 (34%). They frame this as an observed pattern of widening and deepening the business now, with continued diversification and expansion across both new and existing relationships.
UNH · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both new paying counterparties (e.g., new states like West Virginia, hospitals using Rally, healthcare transformation alliance with 10 companies, acquisitions like Banmedica and DaVita) and existing ones enlarging (e.g., serving nearly 1 million more seniors in Medicare, 465,000 more in commercial group, strong growth with existing client base for PBM, doubled Rally IDs, 7% same-store growth for SCA, highest Q4 script growth).

More from the question bank

New leadership already changing what the comRecently unlocked doorPaid to expand: the company's growth spendinComing out of the tunnelNamed catch-up gapThe company's product is being consumed fastAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.