Question Bank › Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity: both new counterparties arriving and existing ones enlarging in the same recent period

Calls Tested
496
Answered YES
88
Hit Rate
17.7%
rare by design

Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) — this company's answers

NO on the Q4 2021 call 2022-01-28 B
The model's full reasoning — Q4 2021 call → NO我们根据提供的电话会议记录回答问题。问题要求判断管理层是否描述近期业务从两方面同时加强:(1) 新的付费交易对手实际到来(新客户、账户、合作伙伴或项目实际签约、订购或开始交易,作为真实事件而非管道);(2) 现有交易对手扩大他们采取的内容(已有账户或关系在同期内明显增加订单、范围、数量、站点、使用量或承诺,由交易对手自己选择而非仅通过提价)。 检查记录:管理层讨论了数字银行平台的增长,如移动活跃用户增加31%,在线银行用户增加37%(这是现有用户的活动增长,可能属于现有关系扩大)。还提到了Zelle的采用,“客户使用量显著”。关于新客户:提到从并购混乱中增加了24人,其中9名是收入生产者,但这些是员工增加,不是客户。还提到“检查账户开户量同比增长35%”,这是新账户。另外,比特币计划是未来计划。关于贷款:管道强劲,但管道是未来。现有贷款增长:贷款(不包括PPP)按年化增长3.7%。但这是整体贷款增长,可能包括新贷款和现有贷款。更具体地说,管理层提到“平均非计息存款增长34%”、“存款成本创纪录低”、“检查账户开户量增加35%”。这些可能表明新客户到来。但问题要求两方面同时发生:新交易对手实际到来,以及现有交易对手扩大规模。记录中是否有明确描述现有客户扩大规模?数字活跃用户增加可能意味着现有客户使用更多,但这是使用量增加,可能是由于平台升级。另外,提到“贷款管道开始成熟”,但那是未来。需要寻找管理层是否明确将两方面的实际增长作为当前模式。 可能的相关点:在战略目标中,提到“并购混乱带来的有机增长机会”,已经增加了人员,但那是人员。关于存款,提到“平均非计息存款增加34%”,这可能是现有客户增加存款或新客户。检查账户开户量增加35%是新账户。但现有客户是否扩大规模?也许数字用户增加是现有客户使用更多。但问题要求“现有交易对手扩大他们采取的内容”,如账户增长、用量增加等。记录中多次提到数字平台活跃用户增加,这可能是现有用户。另外,提到“贷款增长”但未区分新旧。总体而言,管理层似乎强调了新客户获得(如检查账户开户增加)和现有用户参与度提高(如数字活跃用户)。但问题要求“两方面的构建被管理层呈现为已观察到的当前模式”。记录中管理层确实提到了这些实际数字,但可能没有明确将两者联系在一起作为模式。另外,关于贷款,管道是未来,而实际贷款增长3.7%可能包括新贷款和现有贷款的扩大?但未明确。 更仔细地看:在第四季度,管理层提到“贷款结清量大幅增加49%”,这可能是新贷款。但“结清”是实际发生。然而,这可能是新客户或现有客户。另一方面,“预付速度上升50%”,但那是减少。存款方面,检查账户开户量增长35%是新账户。数字用户增长是现有使用增加。但问题要求“现有交易对手扩大他们采取的内容”,比如现有客户增加存款或贷款。似乎没有明确说现有客户增加了他们的存款或贷款规模,而是整体增长可能来自新客户。此外,比特币计划是未来,不是当前。 也许答案是否定的,因为虽然提到了新账户和数字使用增长,但现有客户扩大规模没有被明确描述为“现有关系主动扩大”的事件。相反,活跃用户增加可能是由于平台升级,但也可能被解释为现有客户扩大使用。然而,问题强调“由交易对手自己的选择”,而不仅是价格。我认为记录中确实有数字用户增长,但那是使用量增长,可能属于现有客户扩大使用。同时,检查账户开户量增加是新客户。所以两边都有?但需要看是否被描述为“当前模式”。在Slide 7中,Mike Bingold提到数字平台升级带来增长,用户增加,Zelle使用显著。这可能是新客户和现有客户的使用增加。但检查账户开户量增加明确是新账户。另一方面,现有账户是否扩大?也许平均存款增长包括现有客户存入更多钱。但记录中未明确区分。 为了谨慎,答案应为NO,因为管理层没有明确地将“新客户实际到来”和“现有客户扩大规模”作为两个同时发生的、描述当前业务特征的模式。他们提到了新开户和数字使用增长,但数字使用增长可能由新客户驱动,也可能是现有客户。而且,贷款增长是整体,未拆分。此外,许多增长被描述为“预期”或“管道”。所以我认为没有足够证据表明两方面的构建是明确的。因此回答NO。

← Back to the full FFIC analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that in the RECENT PERIOD the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once — (1) NEW paying counterparties actually arrived: fresh customers, accounts, partners, or programs that actually signed, ordered, or began transacting in the recent period, described as real events rather than pipeline; AND (2) EXISTING counterparties enlarged what they take: accounts or relationships the company already had that visibly stepped up their orders, scope, volumes, sites, usage, or commitments in the same recent period, by the counterparty's own choice rather than through price increases alone — with management presenting this two-sided build as an observed, current pattern that is meaningful to where the company is heading? Answer YES when management's own words convey both halves as already-occurring facts of the recent period, in whatever form fits the industry, grounded in real activity (actual signings, orders, deployments, volumes, or usage) rather than hopes, and management treats the combination — widening and deepening together — as characterizing the business now, with more of both still forming. Answer NO if only one side is present — new wins without existing relationships growing, or expansion within the base without new arrivals. NO if either side is described only through pipeline, interest, plans, or projections. NO if the pattern rests on a single large deal, seasonal catch-up, restocking, or a condition management expects to fade. NO if the growth described is chiefly price increases pushed onto unchanged volumes. NO if the two-sided framing appears only in an analyst's question or summary that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
WRBY Warby Parker Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-09 A
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Q1 2024 2024-05-06 B+
SNV Synovus Financial Corp. Q1 2024 2024-04-18 B
PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Q4 2023 2024-03-08 D
NICE NICE Ltd. Q4 2023 2024-02-22 B+
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado Q3 2023 2023-11-10 C+
DASH DoorDash, Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 C+
BZUN Baozun Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-28 D
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited Q2 2023 2023-08-18 C+
SPT Sprout Social, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-04 B+
PERI Perion Network Ltd. Q2 2023 2023-08-02 A
IMAX IMAX Corporation Q2 2023 2023-07-26 B+
PFIE Profire Energy, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-13 B
SPIR Spire Global, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-10 B
CALX Calix, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-04-20 C+
TACT TransAct Technologies Incorporated Q4 2022 2023-03-08 A
DKS DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-03-07 B
TOST Toast, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-16 C+
ADPT Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-14 C+
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-08 B
CNA CNA Financial Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-06 B
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
MEC Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-05 B+
SYY Sysco Corporation Q1 2023 2022-11-01 C+
KEY KeyCorp Q3 2022 2022-10-20 B+
TMCI Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-13 B+
EVGO EVgo, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-09 C+
DM Desktop Metal, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-08 F
FLR Fluor Corporation Q2 2022 2022-08-05 D
IT Gartner, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-02 A
UPWK Upwork Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 C+
CME CME Group Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 B
OGI OrganiGram Holdings Inc. Q3 2022 2022-07-14 B+
SE Sea Limited Q1 2022 2022-05-17 F
FLYW Flywire Corporation Q1 2022 2022-05-14 B+
ZVIA Zevia PBC Q1 2022 2022-05-12 B
OPK OPKO Health, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-09 D
BXP Boston Properties, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-03 A
CNXC Concentrix Corporation Q1 2022 2022-03-30 B
ZENV Zenvia Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-17 C+
SOPH SOPHiA GENETICS SA Q4 2021 2022-03-15 C
RELY Remitly Global, Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-02 B
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-02-10 D
GTES Gates Industrial Corporation plc Q4 2021 2022-02-07 C+
OOMA Ooma, Inc. Q3 2022 2021-12-02 B+
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 A
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 B+
IRBT iRobot Corporation Q3 2021 2021-10-28 D
ASAN Asana, Inc. Q2 2022 2021-09-01 B+
TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-08-18 C
UFI Unifi, Inc. Q4 2021 2021-08-07 B
TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-27 A
TCBI Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-21 F
CMTL Comtech Telecommunications Corp. Q1 2019 2018-12-07 B+
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. Q3 2019 2018-11-20 A
OGE OGE Energy Corp. Q3 2018 2018-11-08 A
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-07-26 A
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Q2 2018 2018-07-19 B+
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated Q2 2018 2018-06-28 C+
SATS EchoStar Corporation Q1 2018 2018-05-10 C+
BCOV Brightcove Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ALLY Ally Financial Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ILMN Illumina, Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-24 A
UPLD Upland Software, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-03-08 C+
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-02-16 B
DLHC DLH Holdings Corp. Q1 2018 2018-02-06 C+
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Q4 2017 2018-01-16 A
MITK Mitek Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-07 C+
MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-25 C+
SBFG SB Financial Group, Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-20 A
GNTX Gentex Corporation Q3 2017 2017-10-20 B
BCE BCE Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-05 B+
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
FLEX Flex Ltd. Q1 2018 2017-07-28 F
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated Q2 2017 2017-06-08 B
IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-09 C
ICFI ICF International, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-06 B+
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation Q1 2017 2017-02-08 A
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp Q4 2016 2017-01-24 B+
WYY WidePoint Corporation Q3 2016 2016-11-09 D
BCH Banco de Chile Q3 2016 2016-10-30 B+
ULBI Ultralife Corporation Q3 2016 2016-10-29 C+
MAT Mattel, Inc. Q3 2016 2016-10-19 C
VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. Q2 2016 2016-08-09 B+
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+
WK Workiva Inc. Q4 2015 2016-03-01 B
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-25 C

How the model reasoned

PFIE · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management describes intensification from BOTH new paying counterparties AND existing ones enlarging what they take, in the recent period, as observed facts. YES Management describes both new arrivals ("new customers," "new opportunities," "several project opportunities," "notable customers" including specific ones like Equitrans Midstream and Enterprise Products) and existing-customer expansion ("repeat orders," "repeat business," "repeat orders from one of the United States’ largest producers," " 85,000 burner management solutions," "large uptick... on retrofits") as already-completed facts in the recent period. They present the combination—widening the customer base while deepening relationships—as the current observed pattern driving the business forward.
EPAM · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both sides occurring together in the recent period: new engagements with clients (including specific examples like the European multinational and Global Health Services Company that started less than 12 months ago) alongside growth within the top 20 existing accounts (more than 18% year-over-year) and even stronger growth outside those 20 (34%). They frame this as an observed pattern of widening and deepening the business now, with continued diversification and expansion across both new and existing relationships.
UNH · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both new paying counterparties (e.g., new states like West Virginia, hospitals using Rally, healthcare transformation alliance with 10 companies, acquisitions like Banmedica and DaVita) and existing ones enlarging (e.g., serving nearly 1 million more seniors in Medicare, 465,000 more in commercial group, strong growth with existing client base for PBM, doubled Rally IDs, 7% same-store growth for SCA, highest Q4 script growth).

More from the question bank

New leadership already changing what the comRecently unlocked doorPaid to expand: the company's growth spendinComing out of the tunnelNamed catch-up gapThe company's product is being consumed fastAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.