Unplanned use case forcing resource reallocation

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe a SURPRISE demand source — a use case, customer type, application, or secondary/non-core product that management explicitly says it did NOT anticipate, did not design for, or did not include in its original plan — AND state that the company is ALREADY responding by concretely shifting real resources toward it (for example: redirecting engineering or R&D staff, reprioritizing the product roadmap, adding dedicated capacity or salespeople for it, fast-tracking a version built for that use, or moving budget/capex to serve it)? Answer YES only if BOTH elements are clearly present in management's own words (including management's direct answers to analysts): (1) GENUINE SURPRISE, OFF-PLAN ORIGIN: Management itself characterizes the demand as unexpected or outside the original intent — e.g., "we didn't anticipate this application," "customers started using it for something we hadn't designed it for," "this segment came out of nowhere," "an adjacent market found the product," "our secondary product/feature is suddenly the fastest-growing part of the business and that was not the plan." The surprise must concern WHERE the demand comes from or WHAT it is used for — not merely that overall demand is stronger than expected for the intended product in its intended market. AND (2) COSTLY REALLOCATION ALREADY UNDERWAY: Management states that, in response, the company has already begun shifting tangible resources — people, engineering priorities, manufacturing or service capacity, product roadmap, or spending — specifically toward this unplanned demand source. Vague enthusiasm ("we're excited to explore this," "we see a big opportunity," "we're evaluating how to address it") without an actual reallocation that has started does NOT count. Answer NO if: the strong demand is simply the core product succeeding as intended; the "new" use case was part of the company's stated strategy or launch plan all along; the discussion is hypothetical, exploratory, or future-tense only; the reallocation is merely proposed, "under consideration," or aspirational; the surprise demand is mentioned only in an analyst's question that management does not itself confirm; or the shift is a defensive pivot away from a failing core rather than a response to unexpected incoming demand. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.