Volume already booked into a capability that is still being built out

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that the company's current constraint is BUILDING FAST ENOUGH TO SERVE BUSINESS THAT COUNTERPARTIES HAVE ALREADY COMMITTED TO — that is, does management convey BOTH (a) that real, already-committed demand from identifiable counterparties extends beyond what the company can presently produce, deliver, staff, or serve, AND (b) that the company is right now physically expanding its own capability to meet that committed demand, with the expansion already underway rather than planned? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent situation with both halves present as a present-tense reality: (1) DEMAND IS ALREADY COMMITTED AND EXCEEDS PRESENT CAPABILITY. Management points to business that counterparties have actually committed — signed, ordered, contracted, awarded, reserved, prepaid, allocated, booked, enrolled, or otherwise obligated themselves to — that the company cannot fully serve with what it has in place today. The commitment may come from one large counterparty or many small ones, and the form may vary widely across industries: an order book or awarded work extending past current output; customers reserving future units, slots, capacity, volume, or delivery positions; a signed program or relationship whose committed scope exceeds current throughput; waitlists, deposits, subscriptions, or pre-bookings for something not yet available at that scale; deliveries scheduled ahead of what existing capacity can produce. What matters is that the demand is COMMITTED rather than hoped for, and that management conveys the company presently lacks the capability to serve all of it. (2) THE COMPANY IS PHYSICALLY EXPANDING ITS CAPABILITY RIGHT NOW. Management describes real expansion already in motion to close that gap — construction, commissioning, equipment being installed, lines or shifts being added, sites or facilities being opened, people being hired and trained, qualification or certification being completed, systems being stood up, supply being locked in. The expansion should be described as underway or committed and being executed, not as contemplated, under study, awaiting financing, or dependent on approvals the company does not have. Management should convey, directly or plainly in substance, that this gap is meaningful relative to the company's current size — so that the results just reported reflect a company constrained below the level of business it has already secured. Candor about how hard the build is, or about the near-term cost of carrying it, strengthens rather than weakens a YES. Answer NO if the company can comfortably serve everything its counterparties have committed to, however strong the quarter. NO if the demand described is interest, inquiries, pipeline, letters of intent, bids outstanding, market opportunity, or expected demand rather than actually committed by counterparties. NO if the company is expanding capability in anticipation of demand it still hopes to win, with nothing yet committed to fill it. NO if the expansion is only planned, being evaluated, awaiting a final decision, or contingent on financing or approvals not yet obtained. NO if the committed demand and the expansion are both routine in scale for this company — ordinary backlog served by ordinary annual capacity additions, normal seasonal pre-booking, standard replacement investment — with no sense that the company is straining beyond its current level. NO if the binding constraint described is a shortage of inputs the company BUYS, with no claim that its own committed order book exceeds its own capability. NO if management is chiefly explaining that it cannot meet commitments, is renegotiating them downward, or is facing cancellations, penalties, or customers walking away. NO if management is mainly cutting, consolidating, idling, or protecting capacity rather than adding it. NO if the situation appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.