Question Bank › Working for customers it could not have served a

Working for customers it could not have served a year ago

Working for customers it could not have served a year ago: the company's deliverable capability just stepped up a class

Calls Tested
498
Answered YES
35
Hit Rate
7%
rare by design

Precipio, Inc. (PRPO) — this company's answers

NO on the Q3 2018 call 2018-11-19 D
The model's full reasoning — Q3 2018 call → NO我们根据提供的财报电话会议记录，判断管理层是否传达公司现在能做一些一年前不能做的事情，并且有真实客户为此付费，且业务仍处于早期阶段。 分析： 1. 关于ICP（ICE-COLD PCR）技术：一年前只有一个肺癌检测，现在有5个panel覆盖17个外显子5个基因，涉及肺癌、结肠癌、黑色素瘤和胰腺癌。这是产品扩展，但这是否是能力跃升？管理层提到与Perkin Elmer的合作，但那是共同营销协议，尚未有收入。管理层估计2019年收入在几十万到几百万美元之间，但这是预测，不是当前付费工作。所以ICP部分没有证明有付费工作。 2. 关于病理服务：收入从上一季度增长近50%，预计到2019年中期每月超过100万美元。但这是增长，不是能力跃升？管理层提到销售团队扩大，但这是增量改进。没有明确对比一年前不能做什么现在能做什么。 3. 关于IV-Cell和HemeScreen：IV-Cell是专有细胞遗传学培养基，之前与宾大合作验证，现在商业化进行中，但未提及有付费客户。HemeScreen刚推出两周，已收到订单，但这是新测试，是否是一年前不能做的？管理层说HemeScreen源于现有测试的缺陷，他们开发了替代品，现在开始商业化。但这是否是能力跃升？可能，但需要看是否有付费工作。管理层说“自推出以来，我们已经收到了许多订单”，但具体数量未明，且这是新测试，可能算早期。但关键是要有对比：一年前他们不能做这个测试吗？他们之前用的是现有测试，现在有了自己的替代品，但这是否是能力跃升？可能算是，但需要看是否明确对比。 4. 关于实验室内部扩展：CFO提到“成功扩展了内部分子检测能力，这将消除对外包的需求”，这暗示之前外包，现在自己做，这是能力提升，但这是否是付费工作？这是内部能力，不是直接客户付费。 综合来看，管理层没有明确说“一年前我们不能做X，现在能做X，并且有客户为此付费”。他们提到产品线扩展、销售增长、新测试推出，但缺乏具体的before/after对比和付费证明。特别是ICP，虽然有Perkin合作，但收入是预测。HemeScreen有订单，但刚推出，且没有明确对比一年前不能做。病理服务增长是增量。 因此，答案应为NO。

← Back to the full PRPO analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that the company CAN NOW ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING — produce, deliver, serve, handle, or perform at a scale, specification, quality, or complexity — that it COULD NOT DO ROUGHLY A YEAR AGO, and that REAL CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR THAT NEW CAPABILITY NOW, with the business it enables still early? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent capability step-change with all three present: (1) A BEFORE/AFTER IN WHAT THE COMPANY CAN DO: management contrasts — directly or plainly in substance — what the company can now execute against what it could not previously execute: bigger orders or projects than it could formerly take, specifications or performance levels it could not formerly meet, volumes it could not formerly produce, customer classes it could not formerly support, or work it formerly had to decline or subcontract that it now performs itself; (2) THE CAPABILITY IS PROVEN BY PAYING WORK, NOT ASSERTED: real customers are currently paying for output that exercises the new capability — actual orders delivered, projects performed, volumes shipped, or engagements running now that would have been impossible for the company a year ago, described with operating substance; and (3) EARLY RELATIVE TO WHAT IT OPENS: management conveys that the class of business this capability admits the company to is mostly still ahead — the first such engagements are done or underway, more are forming, and the reported results reflect only the beginning of operating at the new level. Answer NO if the new capability is still being built, tested, or awaiting qualification with no paying work exercising it. NO if the step-up is routine incremental improvement rather than a change in what class of work the company can take. NO if the claim is generic ('expanded capabilities,' 'enhanced platform') without concrete before/after substance and paying proof. NO if the newly enabled business is already mature and fully in the numbers. NO if the capability story appears only in an analyst's question management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
HCKT The Hackett Group, Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-08 C
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Q1 2024 2024-05-06 B+
HUYA HUYA Inc. Q4 2023 2024-03-19 C
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. Q4 2023 2024-02-21 C+
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corporation Q2 2024 2024-02-08 D
OPAD Offerpad Solutions Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 C
TGLS Tecnoglass Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-08 A
CARS Cars.com Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-06 B
TSSI TSS, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-04-03 D
TACT TransAct Technologies Incorporated Q4 2022 2023-03-08 A
M Macy's, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-03-02 D
CEIX CONSOL Energy Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-07 B
KFY Korn Ferry Q4 2022 2022-06-22 B
ZVIA Zevia PBC Q1 2022 2022-05-12 B
CNXC Concentrix Corporation Q1 2022 2022-03-30 B
KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-01 C+
NGVT Ingevity Corporation Q4 2021 2022-02-25 B
VNDA Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. Q4 2021 2022-02-23 F
SLQT SelectQuote, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-02-07 F
EXP Eagle Materials Inc. Q3 2022 2022-01-27 B
LC LendingClub Corporation Q4 2021 2022-01-26 A
SXC SunCoke Energy, Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-01 A
LPTH LightPath Technologies, Inc. Q4 2021 2021-09-09 D
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation Q4 2021 2021-08-01 A
UMH UMH Properties, Inc. Q3 2018 2018-11-02 C+
AGIO Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Q3 2018 2018-11-01 C
CUBI Customers Bancorp, Inc. Q3 2018 2018-10-26 C+
LRN Stride, Inc. Q1 2019 2018-10-23 B
PRIM Primoris Services Corporation Q2 2018 2018-08-11 C+
TOUR Tuniu Corporation Q4 2017 2018-03-14 D
HSTM HealthStream, Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-24 C
PSX Phillips 66 Q4 2016 2017-02-03 C+
AEHR Aehr Test Systems Q2 2017 2017-01-05 F
NTCT NetScout Systems, Inc. Q2 2017 2016-10-27 D
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+

How the model reasoned

TGLS · Q2 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management conveys a new capability that they can now do something they couldn't do a year ago, that customers are paying for now, and it's still early. YES Management explicitly contrasts the new capability against the prior limitation: extra capacity now enables them to sell stand-alone architectural glass and aluminum framing products that were previously allocated to window production due to capacity constraints. This is a clear before/after step-change in the class of work they can accept and perform. Real customers are already paying for this new output: the transcript states they have a little bit more installation in stand-alone product sales the rest of the year, and they are now very well positioned to increasingly service large homebuilders’ customers as well as demand for the stand-alone aluminum and glass products, with the absorption of new capacity and ability to offer a wider range of solutions to customers described as positive overall.
TACT · Q4 2022 → YESThe question is: Does management convey that the company CAN NOW ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING that it COULD NOT DO ROUGHLY A YEAR AGO, and that REAL CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR THAT NEW CAPABILITY NOW, ...YES The transcript shows management describing a clear before/after step-change in casino and gaming printers: they could produce printers before, but now they have added a third line in Q3 and begun manufacturing on a fourth line in Q4, enabling them to meet demand and take market share that the prior competitor could not supply 12 months ago.
ZVIA · Q1 2022 → YESThe question is: Does management convey that the company CAN NOW ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING that it COULD NOT DO ROUGHLY A YEAR AGO, and that REAL CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR THAT NEW CAPABILITY NOW, ...YES Management describes the launch of single-serve 12-ounce cans as a first-time capability: “we began selling Zevia’s soda in single cans for the first time in a 12-ounce sleek format,” now “available cold in several grocery retailers” with “some of which is shipping now.

More from the question bank

The product is disappearing into reorder rhyVolume records through a still-fixed gateNamed catch-up gapSelling something whose payoff to the buyer Paid to expand: the company's growth spendinTone of discovery: management sounds newly sAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.