Customers paying to switch away from the incumbent

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management state that customers are actively switching to this company AWAY FROM a named or clearly identified incumbent/competitor, legacy vendor, or entrenched alternative — and that this switching is now happening at meaningful scale or accelerating, not just one anecdote? Answer YES only if BOTH of the following are clearly present in management's own words (including management's direct answers to analysts): (1) DISPLACEMENT, NOT JUST ADOPTION: Management explicitly frames new customer wins as taking share from, replacing, displacing, or winning against a specific competitor, incumbent vendor, legacy system, or status-quo alternative (e.g., "customers are leaving [X] for us," "we replaced [X] at these accounts," "we are displacing the legacy providers," "these wins came out of [X]'s installed base," "customers are consolidating off [X] onto us"). Merely winning new customers, adding logos, or growing in a greenfield market with no incumbent being displaced does NOT count. AND (2) SCALE OR ACCELERATION: Management indicates this switching is recurring, broad-based, or accelerating — e.g., citing multiple such wins, a rising win rate against the incumbent, a wave/stream of migrations, or displacement showing up across segments or geographies. A single isolated competitive win mentioned once does NOT count. Answer NO if: the wins are described only as new demand, category creation, or greenfield expansion with no incumbent being displaced; management mentions competitors only to say the market is competitive or to dismiss them, without claiming actual customer migration; the only displacement claim comes from an analyst's question that management does not itself confirm; or the "switching" is the company's own customers switching between the company's own products. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.