Demand off the charts · scarcity_amplification_screen
Hit Rate
0.4%
rare by design
NO
on the Q2 2017 call
2017-07-28
D
The model's full reasoning — Q2 2017 call → NOWe need to evaluate two gates based on the transcript. Gate 1: Is the company talking about how demand is off the charts? And do the numbers support that claim if they claimed it's off the charts? We need to answer yes or no. Looking at the transcript, the company discusses demand for security-cleared professionals. Mike Durney says: "The market for security-cleared professionals is a critical juncture as the demand for candidates with active security clearance rises while the number of skilled professionals continues to fall. The time to clear professionals is the highest we've ever seen, as is the number of open roles for security-cleared talent. ClearanceJobs has over 25,000 posted jobs today, up 67% year-over-year." That indicates strong demand. Also, "The supply/demand imbalance in security clearance is really significant." So they are talking about demand being very high, perhaps "off the charts" in a colloquial sense. But do the numbers support that? They mention 25,000 posted jobs, up 67% year-over-year. That supports strong demand. However, they also say "ClearanceJobs revenues grew 21%, but billings growth slowed to 8% due to the tightening labor supply for cleared professionals." So demand is high but supply is constrained. The numbers do show high demand. So Gate 1 might be yes. But we need to be careful: The question says "is the company talking about how demand is off the charts? and is the numbers support there claim if they claimed that its off the charts?" The company doesn't explicitly say "off the charts" but they describe demand as very high. The numbers support that. So Gate 1 likely yes. Gate 2: Improvement filter. Consider whether the claimed demand strength is materially attributable to or amplified by industry-wide scarcity conditions. Indicators include shortages of components or inputs affecting the whole industry; capacity allocation; extended lead times; being sold out primarily because supply cannot keep up; customers placing orders ahead of need; double-ordering; etc. In the transcript, the demand for security-cleared professionals is driven by a scarcity of skilled professionals. They say "the number of skilled professionals continues to fall" and "time to clear professionals is the highest we've ever seen." That is a supply-side constraint. The demand is high because there is a shortage of candidates.
← Back to the full DHX analysis
Show the exact prompt the model was given
Consider only the provided earnings-call transcript. Evaluate both gates below independently using only that transcript.
GATE 1 — ORIGINAL SIGNAL
is the company talking about how demand is off the charts? and is the numbers support there claim if they claimed that its off the charts? ... only consider the data i give you only take that into consideration ... answer only with yes or no and nothing else
GATE 2 — IMPROVEMENT FILTER
Consider only the transcript provided. Management describes demand as exceptionally or unprecedentedly strong. Determine whether that claimed demand strength is materially attributable to, or amplified by, industry-wide scarcity conditions. Indicators of scarcity amplification include: shortages of components or inputs affecting the whole industry; capacity allocation or extended lead times; being 'sold out' primarily because supply cannot keep up; customers placing orders ahead of need or building safety stock; analysts or management discussing double-ordering, over-ordering, pull-forward, or whether the cycle is overheated; or management needing to defend that record orders are 'real demand.' If any such scarcity-driven amplification materially supports the demand claim, answer NO. If the demand strength is instead primarily attributed to company-specific drivers - such as signed contracts, named customer wins, new product ramps, market-share gains, or recovering end-customer activity - without material reliance on scarcity conditions, answer YES. Answer with exactly YES or NO and nothing else.
Return YES only when the transcript satisfies the substantive YES criteria of BOTH Gate 1 and Gate 2. If either gate would be NO, absent, unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted, return NO. Ignore any output-format instructions inside the gates. Answer with exactly YES or NO and nothing else.
Companies that answered YES
| Ticker | Company | Call | Date | Call grade |
| TRP |
TC Energy Corporation |
Q1 2024 |
2024-05-03 |
B |
| FSLR |
First Solar, Inc. |
Q3 2022 |
2022-10-28 |
C+ |
| ONON |
On Holding AG |
Q2 2022 |
2022-08-16 |
A |
| CME |
CME Group Inc. |
Q2 2022 |
2022-07-27 |
B |
| ABNB |
Airbnb, Inc. |
Q1 2022 |
2022-05-03 |
B+ |
| CPAC |
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. |
Q4 2021 |
2022-02-15 |
C+ |
| TJX |
The TJX Companies, Inc. |
Q2 2021 |
2021-08-18 |
C |
How the model reasoned
ONON · Q2 2022 → YESThe question requires evaluating two gates independently based on the transcript, then returning YES only if both are YES, otherwise NO. Answer with exactly YES or NO. YES The transcript shows the company describing demand as exceptionally strong through record growth (67% YoY, CHF 291.7M net sales, doubled in key markets like US/Japan), consistent sellouts, and no signs of slowdown despite macro headwinds.
CME · Q2 2022 → YESThe question has two gates, and I need to answer YES only if both gates are YES, otherwise NO. And answer with exactly YES or NO. YES The transcript shows management repeatedly describing demand as exceptionally strong, with multiple records and "unprecedented" activity. Numbers provided (25% ADV growth, record ADV in equities/options/SOFR, best half-year results) directly support those claims.
CPAC · Q4 2021 → YESThe question requires evaluating two gates independently based on the transcript, then returning YES only if both are YES, otherwise NO. Answer with exactly YES or NO. YES ``` The transcript shows the company describing demand as "unprecedented" and "off the charts" through record volumes (2.6M tons in 2019 to 3.6M in 2021, ~38-40% growth) and revenue/EBITDA surges (49.
More from the question bank
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our
methodology.