Fixed-cost base already built, incremental volume now flowing over it

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that the company's heavy spending or build-out phase is essentially BEHIND it — that the cost base, infrastructure, facility, platform, network, fleet, sales organization, or development program required to serve a much larger business is already in place and largely paid for — AND that additional volume, usage, customers, or activity from here can be absorbed on top of that existing base without a proportional increase in spending? Answer YES when management's own framing is that the company has crossed from a building/investing posture into a filling/harvesting posture: for example, describing capacity or infrastructure that is underutilized and now being loaded up, stating that future growth requires little or no incremental fixed investment, pointing to spending that has peaked or is now flattening while activity keeps rising, or explaining that the economics of each incremental unit of business are far better than the average economics reported today. The claim should be presented as a current operating reality about where the company now stands, in whatever form fits the business — not as a distant plan or a generic promise of "leverage over time." Answer NO if the company is still in the middle of, or about to begin, its major build or investment cycle; NO if management is chiefly justifying continued heavy spending; NO if the only relevant language is boilerplate about discipline, efficiency, or cost control without conveying that the capability to serve much more business already exists and is underused; NO if the business has no meaningful fixed base to leverage; and NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question and management does not adopt it. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.