Mid-period crossings

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, is management's account of the just-reported period built substantially around REAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY THAT CROSSED FROM NOT-HAPPENING TO HAPPENING PARTWAY THROUGH THE PERIOD OR JUST AROUND ITS EDGES — and does management make clear that this newly started activity is still completing its climb, so the period's reported numbers averaged the 'before' and 'after' and therefore sit below the level at which the business is already running? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, BOTH halves of this one phenomenon: (1) THE PERIOD CONTAINED REAL STARTS, NARRATED AS STARTS. Management describes one or more concrete pieces of business that genuinely BEGAN during or immediately around the reported period — described in the language of crossing over: began shipping, started production, went live, opened, launched and is now selling, first deliveries made, commenced operations, customer started ordering, came online, started generating revenue. The started thing may take whatever form fits the industry — a contract or program whose deliveries began mid-period; a facility, line, location, or capacity that entered service; a product or offering that began transacting; a customer, market, or channel that went live; an acquisition or capability that started contributing — and one substantial start or several smaller ones both count. What matters is that the activity is REAL AND ALREADY TRANSACTING (actual revenue, orders being filled, output, customers being served — not a plan, a signing with nothing yet performed, a pilot without paying activity, or a launch still ahead), and that management treats these starts as central to the period's story rather than as passing mentions. (2) THE CLIMB IS INCOMPLETE AND THE PRINTED NUMBERS LAG IT. Management conveys, directly or plainly in substance, that because the activity started partway through, the reported results captured only a partial slice of it — and that the business is exiting the period at a higher level than the period's figures show, with the remaining climb a matter of the already-started activity continuing and filling out (further months of what began, the ramp reaching its intended level, utilization building, subsequent deliveries already scheduled or flowing) rather than a matter of winning demand not yet in hand. Management should treat the fuller contribution as meaningful to the company's trajectory relative to its current size. Answer NO if the call describes an established business simply performing well or poorly in its usual rhythm, with nothing meaningful that newly began in or around the period. NO if the new items are still plans, signings without performance, pilots without paying activity, or launches that have not yet occurred. NO if the started activity is trivial or routine for this company — the ordinary cadence of openings, orders, or launches this business always has — with no sense that it changes the company's level of business. NO if the fuller contribution depends chiefly on market recovery, hoped-for demand, approvals, financing, or decisions not yet made. NO if the newly started activity is already fully reflected in the reported results with no meaningful remaining climb. NO if management is chiefly explaining delays, false starts, or problems with things that were supposed to begin. NO if the mid-period timing and remaining climb appear only in an analyst's question or model that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.