Proven first wave, larger second wave already committed

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that an EARLIER, LIMITED FIRST WAVE of business — an initial deployment, first order, pilot, first sites, first units, first program, or first group of adopters — has performed well enough that the SAME counterparty or that same early group has ALREADY COMMITTED to a SUBSTANTIALLY LARGER FOLLOW-ON — and does management present this larger second wave as agreed or in motion now, with delivery ahead of the company? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent two-beat pattern as a present-tense reality: (1) there was an identifiable initial engagement of limited size — a first installation, a trial run, an initial order, a first store, site, system, route, market, or product placement, or an opening phase of a relationship — that has now proven itself in real use, in the counterparty's own judgment; and (2) on the strength of that outcome, the counterparty (or the initial group of adopters) has already stepped up to a materially bigger commitment — expanding from the pilot to a broad rollout, from first units to fleet or production volumes, from one site to many, from an initial order to a multiple of it, from a first phase to a much larger next phase — with management describing this larger commitment as already signed, ordered, agreed, or actively beginning, not merely under discussion. The counterparty may be a customer, partner, distributor, franchisee, payer, or similar, and the form of both waves may be whatever fits the industry. It also counts when management describes this proven-then-enlarged progression as a repeating pattern now occurring across its early adopter base. Answer NO if the follow-on expansion is only hoped for, proposed, in negotiation, or presented as an opportunity the company expects to win; NO if the growth described is routine reordering at similar scale or ordinary same-customer growth without a clearly larger committed step-up from a proven first wave; NO if the company only reports strong overall demand, new customer wins, or a large pipeline without this first-proven-then-enlarged sequence; NO if the initial wave failed, is still being evaluated, or has not yet produced an outcome the counterparty acted on; NO if the described expansion is trivial relative to the company's existing scale or is presented as immaterial; and NO if the pattern is described only in an analyst's question that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.