Question Bank › Stale terms, scheduled reset

Stale terms, scheduled reset

Stale terms, scheduled reset: the existing book is priced for a world that has moved on

Calls Tested
1,435
Answered YES
10
Hit Rate
0.7%
rare by design

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD) — this company's answers

NO on the Q2 2022 call 2022-08-04 D
The model's full reasoning — Q2 2022 call → NO我们根据提供的财报电话会议记录，判断管理层是否描述了现有业务（即公司已有的合同、租约等）以低于当前市场条件的价格/条款持有，并且这些旧条款将在可预见的未来按已确定的日程重置，从而在不依赖新客户或新需求的情况下改善公司经济状况。 在记录中，管理层多次提到定价举措（pricing initiatives）以抵消通胀。例如，George Chappelle说：“we continue to make great progress in repricing our Warehouse business to offset inflationary pressures in our cost structure.” 以及“We have implemented additional targeted pricing and power surcharge initiatives to address this known inflation”。Rob Chambers提到：“we continue to be successful with our pricing initiatives” 和“we will continue our pricing initiatives within our Global Warehouse business in order to address known cost increases from inflation.” 这些定价举措是针对现有客户和现有合同的，因为他们是“repricing”现有业务。管理层还提到“we are being very targeted and data-driven in our approach” 和“Conversations with customers continue to be productive around our pricing initiatives.” 这表明他们正在与现有客户重新谈判价格，以反映当前成本。此外，他们提到“we successfully exited the second quarter with price increases in place in order to cover known inflation from the first quarter.” 这些价格上涨是应用于现有业务的。 关键点：管理层是否明确表示现有合同或业务以低于当前市场条件的价格持有，并且这些合同将在未来重置？他们提到“pricing initiatives”是针对现有客户的，但这是否意味着旧条款低于当前市场？他们是在应对成本通胀，而不是说市场租金上涨。然而，他们提到“rent and storage revenue per economic occupied pallet increased by 6.6%”和“service revenue per throughput pallet increased by 7.9%”，这些是价格增长，但这是他们主动提价的结果，而不是市场条件变化。他们并没有说现有合同是“below market”的，而是说他们正在通过提价来覆盖成本。此外，他们提到“we will exit the third quarter at a run rate covering all known inflation incurred through the second quarter.” 这表明他们正在将成本转嫁给客户，而不是说现有合同低于市场。 问题问的是“existing business is still being carried at prices, rates, or terms set in the past that are now clearly BELOW what the same business would command under current market conditions”。管理层没有明确说现有合同低于市场，而是说他们正在提价以覆盖成本。他们也没有描述一个“schedule”上的重置，而是说他们会根据通胀情况持续提价。他们提到“we will continue to revisit our pricing in power surcharge initiatives.” 这表明提价是持续的，但不是预先确定的日程。 此外，他们提到“we are maintaining our full year 2022 AFFO per share guidance”并且“we expect same-store revenue growth will exceed our previous guidance”但这是因为定价和入住率改善，而不是因为旧合同重置。 因此，管理层没有描述一个“existing book”以低于市场条件持有并将在未来重置的情况。他们描述的是主动提价以应对成本，这更像是成本转嫁，而不是市场租金上涨。所以答案应为NO。 最终答案：NO。

← Back to the full COLD analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that a MEANINGFUL PORTION OF THE COMPANY'S EXISTING BUSINESS is still being carried at prices, rates, or terms set in the past that are now clearly BELOW what the same business would command under current market conditions — AND that this existing business is coming up for repricing, renewal, or reset on a schedule management can already see, so that the company's economics are positioned to improve as those older terms roll off over the coming quarters, WITHOUT needing to win new customers or new demand to get there? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent situation: the company's existing book — its current leases, contracts, charters, policies, agreements, hedges, rate structures, or customer arrangements — was struck under past conditions at levels below what the identical business commands today, and management describes the calendar on which that book resets toward current terms as already determined and largely ahead. This may take whatever form fits the industry: expiring leases or renewing contracts priced below current market, hedges or fixed-price agreements rolling off into a higher-price environment, charters or policies coming up for reset, grandfathered or legacy pricing being reset toward current levels, secured rate or tariff changes only now earning into the book, or escalators and resets built into existing agreements — and management treats the gap between the old terms and current terms as significant to the company's coming results. What matters is that the improvement is already embedded in commitments the company already holds, on a timeline management can describe, rather than depending on anything new being won. Answer NO if the better pricing described applies only to NEW business, new customers, or future sales rather than to the company's existing book as it resets; NO if the repricing described is the ordinary, perpetual background rhythm of the industry with no sense that today's gap between old terms and current terms is unusually wide or meaningful; NO if better terms are only being sought, planned, targeted, or hoped for rather than already secured on a schedule; NO if the pricing discussion is chiefly about passing through the company's own cost increases; NO if the expected improvement depends mainly on market prices, demand, or conditions that have not yet arrived rather than on terms already set to reset; and NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or model that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
SNV Synovus Financial Corp. Q1 2024 2024-04-18 B
FISI Financial Institutions, Inc. Q4 2023 2024-01-26 B
UMBF UMB Financial Corporation Q3 2022 2022-10-26 C+
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-02 B+
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. Q3 2019 2018-11-20 A
T AT&T Inc. Q3 2018 2018-10-24 C+
DBX Dropbox, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-08-09 B
ESS Essex Property Trust, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-08-03 B+
PTC PTC Inc. Q3 2017 2017-07-19 C+
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust Q1 2017 2017-04-21 C+

How the model reasoned

FISI · Q4 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management describes a meaningful portion of the existing business being carried at below-current-market terms, and that it's coming up for repricing on a visible schedul...YES The transcript shows management describing exactly this situation for the company's existing loan and securities portfolios (yields rolling off) and for a meaningful portion of its deposit book (the money-market campaign with 12-month guarantees that reset in July 2024). Jack Plants explicitly ties the expected margin expansion to these scheduled repric ings and redeployments of existing cash flows, stating that the improvement is already embedded in the company's current commitments and does not require new customers or demand. This matches the criteria for a "meaningful portion" of the existing business coming up for repricing on a visible schedule. The answer is therefore YES.
PTC · Q3 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes a meaningful portion of the existing business being carried at below-current-market prices/terms that are coming up for repricing on a visible schedu...YES Management describes a meaningful portion of the existing business (large enterprise customers on volume purchase agreements / perpetual licenses with discounted maintenance) being carried at below-current off-the-shelf rates. These older terms are expiring on a visible schedule (many in Q4 2017), creating a compelling event where customers must either convert 50%+ ACV uplift to subscription or renew maintenance at 25% higher rates. This repricing is already embedded in the existing book and will improve economics without new customers or demand, as confirmed by the large pipeline of such opportunities and the fact that most large deals are already moving to subscription.
UMBF · Q3 2022 → YESThe question is about whether management describes a meaningful portion of the existing business being carried at below-current-market terms that will reprice/reset on a known schedule, improving econ...YES The transcript shows management describing a meaningful portion of the existing loan book carried at past terms that are now below current market levels, with repricing already scheduled: 61% of loans (~$12.1 billion) are variable-rate, 60% repricing in the next quarter and 71% within 12 months, tied to short-end indices. Loan yields rose 74 bp quarter-over-quarter to 4.46% (cycle-to-date beta 37%), and the securities portfolio is rolling off at ~1.83% yield while cash flows fund higher-yielding loans.

More from the question bank

Center of attention has moved to the newest Management is playing referee between competSelling into a customer's own emergencyDemand off the charts · scarcity_amplificatiAnalysts still asking about the old story whOutgrowing the shellAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.