Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) — Earnings Call X-Ray
Our AI read all 38 of ACTG's earnings calls (2016–2025) and answered the same battery of questions about each one. Every past call is free; the newest quarter unlocks with a free account.
Previous Call Grade
B
Q4 2024
Calls Analyzed
38
2016–2025
Avg Candor
6.2/9
evasion 3.9/9
Call-by-call analysis
🔒 Q1 2025 earnings call
2025-05-11
NEWEST
Guidance: ■■■■■Demand: ■■■■■■
Margins: ■■■■Backlog: ■■■■
■ analysts, ■■ questionsexpected move ±■■%
Management ■■■■■■ guidance against ■■■■■■■■ demand and ■■■■■■■ margins. The delivery was ■■■■■■■■ and ■■■■ in specifics, with ■■■ questions left hanging.
🔒 The Q1 2025 call grade is ready
The full 37-point AI read of ACTG's newest earnings call — grade, expected move, and every question answered — is free with an account.
Sign up free to unlock
B
Q4 2024 earnings call
2025-03-13
move ±10.8%
Management held guidance steady against mixed demand signals and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.
Guidance: maintainedDemand: mixedMargins: contractingPricing: stableCapex: increasing 2 analysts · 9 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubtsHidden segment
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
YES Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
A
Q3 2024 earnings call
2024-11-12
move ±9.1%
Management gave no formal guidance against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.
Demand: stableMargins: expandingPricing: stableCapex: flat 3 analysts · 7 questions
✓ Clean call✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubtsDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
NO Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
D
Q2 2024 earnings call
2024-08-08
move ±14.4%
Management gave no formal guidance against mixed demand signals. The delivery was rich in specifics.
Demand: mixedMargins: stable 4 analysts · 8 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
C+
Q1 2024 earnings call
2024-05-11
move ±7.9%
Management gave no formal guidance against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.
Demand: stableMargins: expandingPricing: stableCapex: increasing 4 analysts · 11 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up aheadDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
B
Q4 2023 earnings call
2024-03-14
move ±21.7%
Management gave no formal guidance against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.
Demand: stableMargins: expandingPricing: stableHeadcount: cuttingCapex: increasing 3 analysts · 12 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up ahead
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
D
Q3 2023 earnings call
2023-11-13
move ±7.8%
Management gave no formal guidance against mixed demand signals and contracting margins. The delivery was rich in specifics.
Demand: mixedMargins: contractingHeadcount: cuttingCapex: increasing 3 analysts · 10 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Resolves doubts⚑ Reads rehearsedDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
NO Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
F
Q2 2023 earnings call
2023-08-04
move ±7.9%
Management gave no formal guidance against contracting margins. The delivery was rich in specifics.
Margins: contractingHeadcount: cutting 2 analysts · 4 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging⚑ Reads rehearsedDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
NO Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
YES Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
Earlier calls
| Call | Date | Grade | Guidance | Demand | Margins | Candor | Evasion |
|---|
| Q1 2023 |
2023-05-11 |
D |
none | stable | contracting |
6/9 |
5/9 |
| Q4 2022 |
2023-03-16 |
D |
none | unclear | contracting |
6/9 |
3/9 |
| Q3 2022 |
2022-11-10 |
D |
none | unclear | unclear |
6/9 |
4/9 |
| Q2 2022 |
2022-08-11 |
D |
none | mixed | contracting |
6/9 |
5/9 |
| Q1 2022 |
2022-05-12 |
C |
none | stable | contracting |
7/9 |
4/9 |
| Q4 2021 |
2022-03-31 |
D |
none | stable | expanding |
7/9 |
6/9 |
| Q3 2021 |
2021-11-15 |
C |
none | unclear | contracting |
7/9 |
4/9 |
| Q2 2021 |
2021-08-16 |
F |
none | unclear | expanding |
4/9 |
6/9 |
| Q1 2021 |
2021-05-17 |
F |
none | stable | unclear |
6/9 |
6/9 |
| Q4 2020 |
2021-03-29 |
F |
none | stable | unclear |
5/9 |
6/9 |
| Q3 2020 |
2020-11-09 |
D |
none | stable | unclear |
6/9 |
4/9 |
| Q2 2020 |
2020-08-10 |
C |
none | stable | unclear |
6/9 |
3/9 |
| Q1 2020 |
2020-05-11 |
F |
none | unclear | unclear |
5/9 |
7/9 |
| Q4 2019 |
2020-03-12 |
F |
none | unclear | expanding |
6/9 |
3/9 |
| Q3 2019 |
2019-11-12 |
F |
lowered | slowing | unclear |
5/9 |
6/9 |
| Q2 2019 |
2019-08-06 |
D |
maintained | unclear | unclear |
6/9 |
3/9 |
| Q1 2019 |
2019-05-10 |
D |
maintained | slowing | unclear |
7/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2018 |
2019-03-14 |
D |
none | slowing | unclear |
7/9 |
4/9 |
| Q3 2018 |
2018-10-25 |
C |
none | unclear | expanding |
7/9 |
4/9 |
| Q2 2018 |
2018-08-08 |
F |
none | slowing | expanding |
6/9 |
5/9 |
| Q1 2018 |
2018-05-01 |
F |
maintained | unclear | contracting |
6/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2017 |
2018-02-13 |
F |
none | slowing | expanding |
6/9 |
5/9 |
| Q3 2017 |
2017-10-29 |
D |
maintained | unclear | expanding |
5/9 |
2/9 |
| Q2 2017 |
2017-07-28 |
D |
maintained | slowing | contracting |
7/9 |
2/9 |
| Q1 2017 |
2017-05-04 |
D |
maintained | slowing | expanding |
6/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2016 |
2017-03-09 |
D |
maintained | mixed | contracting |
6/9 |
3/9 |
| Q3 2016 |
2016-10-27 |
F |
none | unclear | contracting |
5/9 |
6/9 |
| Q2 2016 |
2016-07-28 |
D |
maintained | unclear | contracting |
7/9 |
4/9 |
| Q1 2016 |
2016-04-21 |
F |
maintained | slowing | expanding |
6/9 |
5/9 |
| Q4 2015 |
2016-02-25 |
F |
none | slowing | unclear |
8/9 |
5/9 |
Research question bank — earlier calls
During our 1,600-question research program, batches of experimental hypotheses were tested directly against some of ACTG's earlier calls. The YES answers — the rare hits — are shown; click any question to see every company that matched it. Full list: the question bank.
D
Q4 2022 earnings call
2023-03-16
7 more research questions answered NO
How to read this page
The grade is a transparent composite of call quality — candor, specificity, low evasion, low stress, whether the call resolves more doubts than it creates, and the guidance action — not a buy or sell signal. The expected move is a volatility estimate from the one signal that survived our out-of-sample tests: how a stock's own reaction and pre-call volatility predict the size (not direction) of its next move. Full detail, including everything that failed: methodology.
Companies with similar call quality
← ACTA All “A” companies
ACTS →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our
methodology.