StocksH › HPQ

HP Inc. (HPQ) — Earnings Call X-Ray

Our AI read all 38 of HPQ's earnings calls (2016–2025) and answered the same battery of questions about each one. Every past call is free; the newest quarter unlocks with a free account.

Latest Call Grade
🔒
Q2 2025 · sign up to see
Previous Call Grade
C
Q1 2025
Expected Move
🔒
next 45 days · members
Calls Analyzed
38
2016–2025
Avg Candor
6.7/9
evasion 3/9
Skeptic ReassuredCritic AmmunitionEarly Product, Fast GrowthRaising PricesMargins ContractingDemand AcceleratingCutting HeadcountReads Rehearsed

Call-by-call analysis

🔒 Q2 2025 earnings call 2025-05-28 NEWEST

Guidance: ■■■■■Demand: ■■■■■■ Margins: ■■■■Backlog: ■■■■ ■ analysts, ■■ questionsexpected move ±■■%
Candor /9
Specificity /9
Evasion /9
Stress /9

Management ■■■■■■ guidance against ■■■■■■■■ demand and ■■■■■■■ margins. The delivery was ■■■■■■■■ and ■■■■ in specifics, with ■■■ questions left hanging.

🔒 The Q2 2025 call grade is ready
The full 37-point AI read of HPQ's newest earnings call — grade, expected move, and every question answered — is free with an account.
Sign up free to unlock

C Q1 2025 earnings call 2025-02-27 move ±12.2%

Management held guidance steady against accelerating demand and contracting margins. The delivery was rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: acceleratingMargins: contractingPricing: raisingHeadcount: cutting 9 analysts · 18 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth⚑ Reads rehearsed
Candor 6/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 6/9
Stress 4/9
Complexity 5/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
From the research question bank

C Q4 2024 earnings call 2024-11-26 move ±17.1%

Management held guidance steady against accelerating demand. The delivery was rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: acceleratingMargins: stablePricing: under pressureHeadcount: cuttingCapex: increasing 11 analysts · 20 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth
Candor 6/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 4/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

D Q3 2024 earnings call 2024-08-28 move ±9.5%

Management lowered guidance against mixed demand signals and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: loweredDemand: mixedMargins: contractingPricing: under pressureHeadcount: cuttingCapex: flat 8 analysts · 14 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth⚑ Reads rehearsedDirection beats results
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 6/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 4/9
Complexity 3/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C Q2 2024 earnings call 2024-05-29 move ±21.4%

Management held guidance steady against mixed demand signals and expanding margins. The delivery was rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: mixedMargins: expandingPricing: under pressureHeadcount: cutting 9 analysts · 16 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth⚑ Reads rehearsed
Candor 6/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 6/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 5/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C Q1 2024 earnings call 2024-02-28 move ±7.5%

Management held guidance steady against mixed demand signals and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: mixedMargins: expandingPricing: under pressureHeadcount: cutting 10 analysts · 10 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts⚑ Reads rehearsedDirection beats results
Candor 7/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 6/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q4 2023 earnings call 2023-11-21 move ±8.5%

Management held guidance steady against mixed demand signals and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: mixedMargins: expandingPricing: under pressure 8 analysts · 11 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth⚑ Reads rehearsed
Candor 7/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
YES Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C Q3 2023 earnings call 2023-08-29 move ±11.8%

Management lowered guidance against slowing demand. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: loweredDemand: slowingMargins: stablePricing: under pressureHeadcount: cuttingCapex: flat 8 analysts · 13 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts⚑ Reads rehearsedDirection beats results
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 6/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 5/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
YES Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

Earlier calls

CallDateGradeGuidanceDemandMarginsCandorEvasion
Q2 2023 2023-05-30 C+ maintainedslowingstable 7/9 3/9
Q1 2023 2023-02-28 C maintainedslowingstable 7/9 3/9
Q4 2022 2022-11-22 D loweredslowingcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q3 2022 2022-08-30 C loweredslowingcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q2 2022 2022-05-31 B+ raisedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2022 2022-02-28 A raisedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2021 2021-11-23 B maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q3 2021 2021-08-27 C+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 6/9 4/9
Q2 2021 2021-05-27 B raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q1 2021 2021-02-25 C+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 6/9 3/9
Q4 2020 2020-11-24 C maintainedacceleratingstable 7/9 4/9
Q3 2020 2020-08-27 C+ maintainedmixedcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q2 2020 2020-05-27 D withdrawnmixedcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q1 2020 2020-02-25 C raisedmixedexpanding 6/9 4/9
Q4 2019 2019-11-26 D raisedmixedexpanding 6/9 4/9
Q3 2019 2019-08-22 F raisedmixedunclear 6/9 5/9
Q2 2019 2019-05-23 D maintainedmixedexpanding 6/9 4/9
Q1 2019 2019-02-27 C maintainedmixedstable 8/9 2/9
Q4 2018 2018-11-29 C maintainedstablestable 7/9 3/9
Q3 2018 2018-08-24 B raisedacceleratingcontracting 6/9 3/9
Q2 2018 2018-05-29 B+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q1 2018 2018-02-22 B+ raisedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q4 2017 2017-11-21 B raisedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 4/9
Q3 2017 2017-08-24 B+ raisedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q2 2017 2017-05-25 B+ raisedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q1 2017 2017-02-22 C+ maintainedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q4 2016 2016-11-22 C maintainedmixedcontracting 6/9 3/9
Q3 2016 2016-08-24 C+ loweredmixedunclear 7/9 2/9
Q2 2016 2016-05-25 D loweredslowingcontracting 6/9 3/9
Q1 2016 2016-02-24 D maintainedslowingcontracting 7/9 3/9

Research question bank — earlier calls

During our 1,600-question research program, batches of experimental hypotheses were tested directly against some of HPQ's earlier calls. The YES answers — the rare hits — are shown; click any question to see every company that matched it. Full list: the question bank.

D Q4 2022 earnings call 2022-11-22

1 more research questions answered NO

C+ Q3 2016 earnings call 2016-08-24

1 more research questions answered NO

D Q2 2016 earnings call 2016-05-25

How to read this page

The grade is a transparent composite of call quality — candor, specificity, low evasion, low stress, whether the call resolves more doubts than it creates, and the guidance action — not a buy or sell signal. The expected move is a volatility estimate from the one signal that survived our out-of-sample tests: how a stock's own reaction and pre-call volatility predict the size (not direction) of its next move. Full detail, including everything that failed: methodology.

Companies with similar call quality

AAP · Advance Auto Parts, Inc.ABCAF · Athabasca Minerals, Inc.ABDC · Alcentra Capital'sABMD · Abiomed, Inc.ABNRY · ABN AMRO Bank N.V.ABOS · Acumen Pharmaceuticals,

HPP   All “H” companies    HPR

Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.