Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) — Earnings Call X-Ray
Our AI read all 37 of LADR's earnings calls (2016–2025) and answered the same battery of questions about each one. Every past call is free; the newest quarter unlocks with a free account.
Previous Call Grade
B+
Q1 2025
Calls Analyzed
37
2016–2025
Avg Candor
7.8/9
evasion 1.8/9
Call-by-call analysis
🔒 Q2 2025 earnings call
2025-07-24
NEWEST
Guidance: ■■■■■Demand: ■■■■■■
Margins: ■■■■Backlog: ■■■■
■ analysts, ■■ questionsexpected move ±■■%
Management ■■■■■■ guidance against ■■■■■■■■ demand and ■■■■■■■ margins. The delivery was ■■■■■■■■ and ■■■■ in specifics, with ■■■ questions left hanging.
🔒 The Q2 2025 call grade is ready
The full 37-point AI read of LADR's newest earnings call — grade, expected move, and every question answered — is free with an account.
Sign up free to unlock
B+
Q1 2025 earnings call
2025-04-24
move ±8.4%
Management held guidance steady against accelerating demand. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.
Guidance: maintainedDemand: acceleratingMargins: stableBacklog: growingPricing: raising 4 analysts · 7 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up aheadFounder-led
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
YES Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
B+
Q2 2024 earnings call
2024-07-25
move ±6.9%
Management gave no formal guidance against mixed demand signals. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.
Demand: mixedMargins: stableBacklog: growingPricing: under pressure 5 analysts · 11 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up aheadFounder-led
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
B
Q1 2024 earnings call
2024-04-25
move ±8.7%
Management gave no formal guidance against mixed demand signals. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.
Demand: mixedMargins: stableBacklog: shrinkingPricing: stable 5 analysts · 12 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Resolves doubtsFounder-ledDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
B+
Q4 2023 earnings call
2024-02-08
move ±6.7%
Management gave no formal guidance against mixed demand signals. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.
Demand: mixedMargins: stableBacklog: shrinkingPricing: stable 5 analysts · 15 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up aheadFounder-led
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
From the research question bank
8 more research questions answered NO
B+
Q3 2023 earnings call
2023-10-26
move ±8.3%
Management held guidance steady against slowing demand. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.
Guidance: maintainedDemand: slowingMargins: stableBacklog: shrinkingPricing: raisingCapex: decreasing 5 analysts · 13 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubtsFounder-led
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
B+
Q2 2023 earnings call
2023-07-26
move ±9.7%
Management gave no formal guidance against mixed demand signals. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.
Demand: mixedMargins: stableBacklog: shrinkingPricing: stable 3 analysts · 5 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up aheadFounder-led
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
YES Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
B+
Q1 2023 earnings call
2023-04-27
move ±8.5%
Management gave no formal guidance against slowing demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.
Demand: slowingMargins: expandingPricing: stable 5 analysts · 11 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubtsFounder-led
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
Earlier calls
| Call | Date | Grade | Guidance | Demand | Margins | Candor | Evasion |
|---|
| Q4 2022 |
2023-02-09 |
A |
raised | slowing | expanding |
8/9 |
1/9 |
| Q3 2022 |
2022-10-27 |
A |
raised | slowing | expanding |
8/9 |
1/9 |
| Q2 2022 |
2022-07-28 |
B+ |
raised | mixed | expanding |
7/9 |
2/9 |
| Q1 2022 |
2022-04-28 |
B+ |
raised | stable | expanding |
7/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2021 |
2022-02-10 |
B+ |
raised | stable | expanding |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q3 2021 |
2021-10-28 |
B+ |
raised | accelerating | stable |
7/9 |
1/9 |
| Q2 2021 |
2021-07-29 |
B+ |
raised | accelerating | stable |
7/9 |
2/9 |
| Q1 2021 |
2021-05-06 |
B+ |
raised | accelerating | contracting |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2020 |
2021-02-26 |
B+ |
maintained | accelerating | unclear |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q3 2020 |
2020-10-29 |
C+ |
none | mixed | stable |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q2 2020 |
2020-07-31 |
C+ |
none | slowing | contracting |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q1 2020 |
2020-05-06 |
C+ |
none | slowing | contracting |
7/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2019 |
2020-02-27 |
B+ |
none | stable | contracting |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q3 2019 |
2019-11-07 |
B+ |
maintained | stable | unclear |
8/9 |
1/9 |
| Q2 2019 |
2019-07-31 |
A |
maintained | stable | stable |
8/9 |
1/9 |
| Q1 2019 |
2019-05-07 |
B+ |
none | slowing | expanding |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2018 |
2019-02-27 |
B+ |
none | mixed | contracting |
8/9 |
1/9 |
| Q3 2018 |
2018-11-01 |
A |
raised | mixed | contracting |
8/9 |
1/9 |
| Q2 2018 |
2018-07-31 |
A |
raised | stable | expanding |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q1 2018 |
2018-05-02 |
B |
maintained | mixed | stable |
7/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2017 |
2018-03-04 |
B+ |
raised | accelerating | expanding |
7/9 |
2/9 |
| Q3 2017 |
2017-11-02 |
C+ |
none | accelerating | stable |
7/9 |
3/9 |
| Q2 2017 |
2017-08-02 |
B |
none | stable | stable |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q1 2017 |
2017-05-09 |
B+ |
none | mixed | contracting |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2016 |
2017-02-23 |
B+ |
none | mixed | stable |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q3 2016 |
2016-11-06 |
B+ |
none | mixed | stable |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q2 2016 |
2016-08-07 |
B+ |
maintained | mixed | contracting |
8/9 |
1/9 |
| Q1 2016 |
2016-05-05 |
C+ |
none | slowing | contracting |
8/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2015 |
2016-03-04 |
B |
none | slowing | contracting |
8/9 |
2/9 |
Research question bank — earlier calls
During our 1,600-question research program, batches of experimental hypotheses were tested directly against some of LADR's earlier calls. The YES answers — the rare hits — are shown; click any question to see every company that matched it. Full list: the question bank.
B+
Q3 2016 earnings call
2016-11-06
1 more research questions answered NO
How to read this page
The grade is a transparent composite of call quality — candor, specificity, low evasion, low stress, whether the call resolves more doubts than it creates, and the guidance action — not a buy or sell signal. The expected move is a volatility estimate from the one signal that survived our out-of-sample tests: how a stock's own reaction and pre-call volatility predict the size (not direction) of its next move. Full detail, including everything that failed: methodology.
Companies with similar call quality
← LAD All “L” companies
LAES →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our
methodology.