StocksP › PNM

PNM Resources, Inc. (PNM) — Earnings Call X-Ray

Our AI read all 30 of PNM's earnings calls (2016–2024) and answered the same battery of questions about each one. Every past call is free; the newest quarter unlocks with a free account.

Latest Call Grade
🔒
Q2 2024 · sign up to see
Previous Call Grade
B
Q1 2024
Expected Move
🔒
next 45 days · members
Calls Analyzed
30
2016–2024
Avg Candor
6.8/9
evasion 3/9
High CandorSkeptic ReassuredCritic AmmunitionRaising PricesDemand AcceleratingBacklog GrowingCapex IncreasingReads Rehearsed

Call-by-call analysis

🔒 Q2 2024 earnings call 2024-07-31 NEWEST

Guidance: ■■■■■Demand: ■■■■■■ Margins: ■■■■Backlog: ■■■■ ■ analysts, ■■ questionsexpected move ±■■%
Candor /9
Specificity /9
Evasion /9
Stress /9

Management ■■■■■■ guidance against ■■■■■■■■ demand and ■■■■■■■ margins. The delivery was ■■■■■■■■ and ■■■■ in specifics, with ■■■ questions left hanging.

🔒 The Q2 2024 call grade is ready
The full 37-point AI read of PNM's newest earnings call — grade, expected move, and every question answered — is free with an account.
Sign up free to unlock

B Q1 2024 earnings call 2024-04-30

Management held guidance steady against accelerating demand. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: acceleratingMargins: stableBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: increasing 1 analysts · 5 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts⚑ Reads rehearsed
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 3/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 1/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q4 2023 earnings call 2024-02-06

Management held guidance steady against accelerating demand. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: acceleratingMargins: stableBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: increasing 4 analysts · 9 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 3/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B+ Q3 2023 earnings call 2023-10-27

Management raised guidance against accelerating demand. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: acceleratingMargins: stableBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: increasing 4 analysts · 10 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 3/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

D Q2 2023 earnings call 2023-08-04

Management held guidance steady against accelerating demand. The delivery was rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: acceleratingMargins: stableBacklog: growingPricing: stableHeadcount: growingCapex: increasing 3 analysts · 12 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable
Candor 6/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 5/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 3/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 7/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

D Q1 2023 earnings call 2023-05-05

Management held guidance steady against accelerating demand. The delivery was rich in specifics, frequently evasive.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: acceleratingMargins: stablePricing: raisingCapex: increasing 5 analysts · 17 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable
Candor 6/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 6/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 6/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C Q4 2022 earnings call 2023-02-24

Management raised guidance against accelerating demand. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: acceleratingMargins: stablePricing: raisingHeadcount: growingCapex: increasing 5 analysts · 16 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 5/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 6/9
Promotion 3/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B+ Q3 2022 earnings call 2022-11-04

Management raised guidance against mixed demand signals. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: mixedMargins: stablePricing: raisingCapex: increasing 3 analysts · 11 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts⚑ Reads rehearsed
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

Earlier calls

CallDateGradeGuidanceDemandMarginsCandorEvasion
Q2 2022 2022-08-07 C+ maintainedmixedcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q1 2022 2022-04-30 D maintainedstableexpanding 6/9 3/9
Q3 2020 2020-11-01 A raisedmixedunclear 6/9 2/9
Q3 2020 2020-10-30 A raisedmixedstable 7/9 2/9
Q2 2020 2020-07-31 B maintainedmixedstable 7/9 2/9
Q1 2020 2020-05-01 A maintainedmixedstable 8/9 2/9
Q4 2019 2020-02-28 B+ maintainedacceleratingstable 8/9 1/9
Q3 2019 2019-11-01 B maintainedacceleratingstable 7/9 2/9
Q2 2019 2019-08-02 C loweredmixedunclear 7/9 3/9
Q1 2019 2019-05-10 A raisedacceleratingstable 7/9 3/9
Q4 2018 2019-02-27 D raisedacceleratingstable 5/9 6/9
Q3 2018 2018-11-11 B+ raisedacceleratingstable 7/9 3/9
Q2 2018 2018-07-31 A raisedacceleratingstable 7/9 2/9
Q1 2018 2018-04-27 B maintainedmixedstable 7/9 2/9
Q4 2017 2018-02-28 C+ loweredmixedstable 7/9 2/9
Q3 2017 2017-10-27 C+ maintainedmixedstable 6/9 3/9
Q2 2017 2017-07-28 C+ maintainedstablestable 7/9 3/9
Q1 2017 2017-04-28 C maintainedmixedstable 7/9 7/9
Q4 2016 2017-02-28 B maintainedmixedstable 7/9 2/9
Q3 2016 2016-10-28 C+ maintainedmixedstable 8/9 2/9
Q2 2016 2016-08-09 F loweredmixedunclear 7/9 4/9
Q1 2016 2016-04-29 C+ maintainedmixedstable 7/9 3/9

How to read this page

The grade is a transparent composite of call quality — candor, specificity, low evasion, low stress, whether the call resolves more doubts than it creates, and the guidance action — not a buy or sell signal. The expected move is a volatility estimate from the one signal that survived our out-of-sample tests: how a stock's own reaction and pre-call volatility predict the size (not direction) of its next move. Full detail, including everything that failed: methodology.

Companies with similar call quality

A · Agilent Technologies, InAAFRF · Airtel Africa PlcAAIC · Arlington Asset InvestmeAAUKF · Anglo American plcAB · AllianceBernstein HoldinABC · AmerisourceBergen Corpor

PNLYY   All “P” companies    PNNT

Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.