StocksS › STE

STERIS plc (STE) — Earnings Call X-Ray

Our AI read all 39 of STE's earnings calls (2016–2025) and answered the same battery of questions about each one. Every past call is free; the newest quarter unlocks with a free account.

Latest Call Grade
🔒
Q4 2025 · sign up to see
Previous Call Grade
D
Q3 2025
Expected Move
🔒
next 45 days · members
Calls Analyzed
39
2016–2025
Avg Candor
7.5/9
evasion 2.2/9
Guidance LoweredHigh CandorSkeptic ReassuredCritic AmmunitionRaising PricesMargins ExpandingBacklog GrowingCapex Increasing

Call-by-call analysis

🔒 Q4 2025 earnings call 2025-05-15 NEWEST

Guidance: ■■■■■Demand: ■■■■■■ Margins: ■■■■Backlog: ■■■■ ■ analysts, ■■ questionsexpected move ±■■%
Candor /9
Specificity /9
Evasion /9
Stress /9

Management ■■■■■■ guidance against ■■■■■■■■ demand and ■■■■■■■ margins. The delivery was ■■■■■■■■ and ■■■■ in specifics, with ■■■ questions left hanging.

🔒 The Q4 2025 call grade is ready
The full 37-point AI read of STE's newest earnings call — grade, expected move, and every question answered — is free with an account.
Sign up free to unlock

D Q3 2025 earnings call 2025-02-06 move ±7.2%

Management lowered guidance against mixed demand signals and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: loweredDemand: mixedMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: increasing 7 analysts · 15 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts
Candor 7/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 4/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 3/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q2 2025 earnings call 2024-11-07 move ±8.2%

Management held guidance steady against mixed demand signals and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: mixedMargins: contractingBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: increasing 6 analysts · 18 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts
Candor 8/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 2/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q1 2025 earnings call 2024-08-07 move ±9%

Management held guidance steady against steady demand and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: stableMargins: contractingBacklog: shrinkingPricing: raisingCapex: increasing 6 analysts · 15 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts
Candor 7/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 3/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 5/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B Q4 2024 earnings call 2024-05-09 move ±9.6%

Management held guidance steady against mixed demand signals and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: mixedMargins: contractingBacklog: stablePricing: raisingCapex: flat 6 analysts · 9 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts⚑ Reads rehearsed
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 3/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
YES Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B+ Q3 2024 earnings call 2024-02-08 move ±7.9%

Management raised guidance against mixed demand signals and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: mixedMargins: contractingBacklog: shrinkingPricing: raisingCapex: flat 7 analysts · 14 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts
Candor 8/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 2/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B+ Q2 2024 earnings call 2023-11-08 move ±9.4%

Management held guidance steady against mixed demand signals and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: mixedMargins: contractingBacklog: shrinkingPricing: raisingCapex: decreasing 5 analysts · 14 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubtsDirection beats results
Candor 8/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 1/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 3/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B Q1 2024 earnings call 2023-08-02 move ±6.8%

Management held guidance steady against mixed demand signals and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: mixedMargins: contractingBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: flat 7 analysts · 20 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubtsDirection beats results
Candor 8/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 1/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 6/9
Promotion 2/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

Earlier calls

CallDateGradeGuidanceDemandMarginsCandorEvasion
Q4 2023 2023-05-11 B+ maintainedacceleratingcontracting 8/9 1/9
Q3 2023 2023-02-09 C loweredmixedcontracting 8/9 2/9
Q2 2023 2022-11-10 C loweredmixedcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q1 2023 2022-08-03 B loweredstablecontracting 8/9 1/9
Q4 2022 2022-05-12 C+ maintainedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 4/9
Q3 2022 2022-02-09 B+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q2 2022 2021-11-03 B maintainedacceleratingexpanding 8/9 2/9
Q1 2022 2021-08-10 B+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2021 2021-05-19 A maintainedmixedstable 8/9 2/9
Q3 2021 2021-02-03 B+ maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q2 2021 2020-11-03 B nonemixedexpanding 8/9 2/9
Q2 2021 2020-11-03 D withdrawnmixedexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q1 2021 2020-08-04 B nonemixedexpanding 8/9 2/9
Q4 2020 2020-05-14 D withdrawnmixedstable 7/9 3/9
Q3 2020 2020-02-11 A raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q2 2020 2019-11-05 B+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2020 2019-08-07 A raisedacceleratingexpanding 8/9 1/9
Q4 2019 2019-05-14 B maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q3 2019 2019-02-12 A raisedstableexpanding 8/9 2/9
Q2 2019 2018-11-06 A raisedstablecontracting 8/9 2/9
Q1 2019 2018-08-08 B+ maintainedstableexpanding 8/9 2/9
Q4 2018 2018-05-09 B+ maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q3 2018 2018-02-07 A raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q2 2018 2017-11-01 B+ maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2018 2017-08-08 A maintainedstableexpanding 8/9 1/9
Q4 2017 2017-05-09 B maintainedstableexpanding 8/9 2/9
Q3 2017 2017-02-07 C loweredmixedexpanding 8/9 2/9
Q2 2017 2016-11-02 C+ loweredmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2017 2016-08-09 C+ loweredmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2016 2016-05-18 C+ maintainedmixedexpanding 8/9 3/9
Q3 2016 2016-02-09 B maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9

Research question bank — earlier calls

During our 1,600-question research program, batches of experimental hypotheses were tested directly against some of STE's earlier calls. The YES answers — the rare hits — are shown; click any question to see every company that matched it. Full list: the question bank.

C+ Q4 2022 earnings call 2022-05-12

1 more research questions answered NO

How to read this page

The grade is a transparent composite of call quality — candor, specificity, low evasion, low stress, whether the call resolves more doubts than it creates, and the guidance action — not a buy or sell signal. The expected move is a volatility estimate from the one signal that survived our out-of-sample tests: how a stock's own reaction and pre-call volatility predict the size (not direction) of its next move. Full detail, including everything that failed: methodology.

Companies with similar call quality

AAC · AAC Holdings'AACAY · AAC Technologies HoldingAACG · ATA Creativity GlobalAADI · Aadi Bioscience, Inc.AALBF · Aalberts N.V.AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics,

STDAF   All “S” companies    STECF

Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.