StocksA › AWI

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) — Earnings Call X-Ray

Our AI read all 38 of AWI's earnings calls (2016–2025) and answered the same battery of questions about each one. Every past call is free; the newest quarter unlocks with a free account.

Latest Call Grade
🔒
Q1 2025 · sign up to see
Previous Call Grade
B
Q4 2024
Expected Move
🔒
next 45 days · members
Calls Analyzed
38
2016–2025
Avg Candor
7.1/9
evasion 2.2/9
High CandorSkeptic ReassuredCritic AmmunitionEarly Product, Fast GrowthRaising PricesMargins ExpandingBacklog GrowingCapex Increasing

Call-by-call analysis

🔒 Q1 2025 earnings call 2025-04-29 NEWEST

Guidance: ■■■■■Demand: ■■■■■■ Margins: ■■■■Backlog: ■■■■ ■ analysts, ■■ questionsexpected move ±■■%
Candor /9
Specificity /9
Evasion /9
Stress /9

Management ■■■■■■ guidance against ■■■■■■■■ demand and ■■■■■■■ margins. The delivery was ■■■■■■■■ and ■■■■ in specifics, with ■■■ questions left hanging.

🔒 The Q1 2025 call grade is ready
The full 37-point AI read of AWI's newest earnings call — grade, expected move, and every question answered — is free with an account.
Sign up free to unlock

B Q4 2024 earnings call 2025-02-25 move ±7.7%

Management held guidance steady against mixed demand signals and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: mixedMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: increasing 8 analysts · 14 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 6/9
Stress 1/9
Complexity 3/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
YES Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

A Q3 2024 earnings call 2024-10-29 move ±6.7%

Management raised guidance against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.

Guidance: raisedDemand: stableMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: decreasing 9 analysts · 17 questions
✓ Clean call✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth⚑ Reads rehearsed
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 1/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 1/9
Complexity 3/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
NO Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

A Q2 2024 earnings call 2024-07-30 move ±8.2%

Management raised guidance against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.

Guidance: raisedDemand: stableMargins: expandingBacklog: stablePricing: raisingCapex: increasing 9 analysts · 20 questions
✓ Clean call✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 1/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 1/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
NO Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

A Q1 2024 earnings call 2024-04-30 move ±7.1%

Management raised guidance against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.

Guidance: raisedDemand: stableMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: flat 9 analysts · 20 questions
✓ Clean call✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 1/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
NO Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B Q4 2023 earnings call 2024-02-20 move ±10.1%

Management held guidance steady against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: stableMargins: expandingBacklog: stablePricing: raisingCapex: increasing 9 analysts · 17 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 6/9
Stress 1/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
YES Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

A Q3 2023 earnings call 2023-10-24 move ±9.5%

Management raised guidance against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.

Guidance: raisedDemand: stableMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: increasing 8 analysts · 14 questions
✓ Clean call✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 1/9
Complexity 3/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
NO Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
YES Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B+ Q2 2023 earnings call 2023-07-25 move ±7%

Management raised guidance against mixed demand signals and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, relaxed under questioning.

Guidance: raisedDemand: mixedMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: increasing 9 analysts · 20 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 6/9
Stress 1/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

Earlier calls

CallDateGradeGuidanceDemandMarginsCandorEvasion
Q1 2023 2023-04-25 C+ maintainedslowingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q4 2022 2023-02-26 C maintainedslowingexpanding 7/9 4/9
Q3 2022 2022-10-25 C+ loweredslowingcontracting 8/9 2/9
Q2 2022 2022-07-26 B+ loweredstablecontracting 8/9 1/9
Q1 2022 2022-04-26 B maintainedmixedcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q4 2021 2022-02-22 B+ maintainedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q3 2021 2021-10-26 C+ maintainedmixedcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q2 2021 2021-07-27 A raisedacceleratingexpanding 8/9 1/9
Q1 2021 2021-04-27 B+ maintainedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 1/9
Q4 2020 2021-02-23 B+ maintainedmixedcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q3 2020 2020-10-27 C+ loweredacceleratingcontracting 8/9 1/9
Q2 2020 2020-07-28 B maintainedacceleratingcontracting 8/9 2/9
Q1 2020 2020-04-27 D withdrawnslowingcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q4 2019 2020-02-24 B maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q3 2019 2019-10-28 B+ raisedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q2 2019 2019-07-29 B+ maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2019 2019-04-29 B maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2018 2019-02-25 A maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 1/9
Q3 2018 2018-10-30 A raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q2 2018 2018-07-31 B+ raisedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2018 2018-04-30 A raisedacceleratingexpanding 8/9 1/9
Q4 2017 2018-02-26 B maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q3 2017 2017-10-30 B+ raisedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q2 2017 2017-07-31 B raisedacceleratingexpanding 6/9 4/9
Q1 2017 2017-05-01 C maintainedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 4/9
Q4 2016 2017-02-27 B+ maintainedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q3 2016 2016-10-31 C maintainedmixedcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q2 2016 2016-07-30 C loweredmixedexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q1 2016 2016-05-09 C+ maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2015 2016-02-22 D withdrawnmixedstable 7/9 5/9

Research question bank — earlier calls

During our 1,600-question research program, batches of experimental hypotheses were tested directly against some of AWI's earlier calls. The YES answers — the rare hits — are shown; click any question to see every company that matched it. Full list: the question bank.

B+ Q3 2017 earnings call 2017-10-30

2 more research questions answered NO

How to read this page

The grade is a transparent composite of call quality — candor, specificity, low evasion, low stress, whether the call resolves more doubts than it creates, and the guidance action — not a buy or sell signal. The expected move is a volatility estimate from the one signal that survived our out-of-sample tests: how a stock's own reaction and pre-call volatility predict the size (not direction) of its next move. Full detail, including everything that failed: methodology.

Companies with similar call quality

A · Agilent Technologies, InAAFRF · Airtel Africa PlcAAIC · Arlington Asset InvestmeAAUKF · Anglo American plcAB · AllianceBernstein HoldinABC · AmerisourceBergen Corpor

AWH   All “A” companies    AWK

Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.