StocksH › HQY

HealthEquity, Inc. (HQY) — Earnings Call X-Ray

Our AI read all 40 of HQY's earnings calls (2015–2025) and answered the same battery of questions about each one. Every past call is free; the newest quarter unlocks with a free account.

Latest Call Grade
🔒
Q1 2026 · sign up to see
Previous Call Grade
C+
Q4 2025
Expected Move
🔒
next 45 days · members
Calls Analyzed
40
2015–2025
Avg Candor
6.9/9
evasion 2.9/9
High CandorSkeptic ReassuredCritic AmmunitionEarly Product, Fast GrowthMargins ContractingDemand AcceleratingResults Worse Than Direction

Call-by-call analysis

🔒 Q1 2026 earnings call 2025-06-04 NEWEST

Guidance: ■■■■■Demand: ■■■■■■ Margins: ■■■■Backlog: ■■■■ ■ analysts, ■■ questionsexpected move ±■■%
Candor /9
Specificity /9
Evasion /9
Stress /9

Management ■■■■■■ guidance against ■■■■■■■■ demand and ■■■■■■■ margins. The delivery was ■■■■■■■■ and ■■■■ in specifics, with ■■■ questions left hanging.

🔒 The Q1 2026 call grade is ready
The full 37-point AI read of HQY's newest earnings call — grade, expected move, and every question answered — is free with an account.
Sign up free to unlock

C+ Q4 2025 earnings call 2025-03-18 move ±23.2%

Management held guidance steady against accelerating demand and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: acceleratingMargins: contractingPricing: stableCapex: flat 10 analysts · 11 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growthDirection beats results
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
YES Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B+ Q3 2025 earnings call 2024-12-10 move ±9.7%

Management raised guidance against accelerating demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: acceleratingMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: raisingHeadcount: growing 11 analysts · 13 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growth
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
YES Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
YES Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
YES Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

A Q2 2025 earnings call 2024-09-03 move ±12.2%

Management raised guidance against accelerating demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: acceleratingMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: stableHeadcount: growingCapex: increasing 11 analysts · 18 questions
✓ Clean call✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up ahead✓ Early product, fast growth
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
NO Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
YES Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
YES Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B+ Q1 2025 earnings call 2024-06-03 move ±9%

Management raised guidance against accelerating demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: acceleratingMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: stable 10 analysts · 14 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growthFounder-led
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 2/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
YES Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
YES Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B+ Q4 2024 earnings call 2024-03-19 move ±8.6%

Management raised guidance against accelerating demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: acceleratingMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: under pressureCapex: increasing 10 analysts · 15 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up ahead✓ Early product, fast growth
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
YES Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B+ Q3 2024 earnings call 2023-12-05 move ±7.6%

Management raised guidance against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: stableMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: under pressure 8 analysts · 16 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up aheadFounder-led
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 6/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q2 2024 earnings call 2023-09-05 move ±10.9%

Management raised guidance against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: stableMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: raisingCapex: flat 10 analysts · 22 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growthFounder-led
Candor 6/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 5/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 3/9
Promotion 6/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 7/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
YES Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
YES Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

Earlier calls

CallDateGradeGuidanceDemandMarginsCandorEvasion
Q1 2024 2023-06-05 A raisedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2023 2023-03-21 B+ raisedstableexpanding 7/9 4/9
Q3 2023 2022-12-07 A raisedstableexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q2 2023 2022-09-07 B+ raisedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q1 2023 2022-06-06 B+ raisedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q4 2022 2022-03-23 C+ maintainedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q3 2022 2021-12-06 F loweredmixedstable 7/9 4/9
Q2 2022 2021-09-08 C maintainedacceleratingstable 7/9 4/9
Q1 2022 2021-06-07 B raisedacceleratingcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q4 2021 2021-03-15 C+ maintainedmixedcontracting 7/9 3/9
Q3 2021 2020-12-07 B+ raisedmixedstable 7/9 3/9
Q2 2021 2020-09-09 A raisedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2021 2020-06-02 C withdrawnmixedcontracting 8/9 3/9
Q4 2020 2020-03-17 C loweredstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q3 2020 2019-12-04 C+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 6/9 3/9
Q2 2020 2019-09-04 B+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q1 2020 2019-06-04 B raisedacceleratingexpanding 6/9 4/9
Q4 2019 2019-03-18 B maintainedacceleratingexpanding 6/9 2/9
Feb 2019 2019-02-06 B+ raisedmixedstable 7/9 3/9
Q3 2019 2018-12-04 B raisedacceleratingexpanding 6/9 3/9
Q2 2019 2018-09-04 A raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2019 2018-06-05 A raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2018 2018-03-20 B raisedacceleratingexpanding 6/9 3/9
Q3 2018 2017-12-05 B+ maintainedacceleratingstable 7/9 2/9
Q2 2018 2017-09-06 B raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q1 2018 2017-06-06 B+ raisedstablestable 7/9 3/9
Q4 2017 2017-03-22 B+ maintainedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q3 2017 2016-12-06 B+ maintainedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q2 2017 2016-09-07 B+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q1 2017 2016-06-07 B+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q4 2016 2016-03-22 B+ noneacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q3 2016 2015-12-07 B+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 6/9 3/9

Research question bank — earlier calls

During our 1,600-question research program, batches of experimental hypotheses were tested directly against some of HQY's earlier calls. The YES answers — the rare hits — are shown; click any question to see every company that matched it. Full list: the question bank.

A Q1 2024 earnings call 2023-06-05

1 more research questions answered NO

B Q3 2019 earnings call 2018-12-04

How to read this page

The grade is a transparent composite of call quality — candor, specificity, low evasion, low stress, whether the call resolves more doubts than it creates, and the guidance action — not a buy or sell signal. The expected move is a volatility estimate from the one signal that survived our out-of-sample tests: how a stock's own reaction and pre-call volatility predict the size (not direction) of its next move. Full detail, including everything that failed: methodology.

Companies with similar call quality

AA · Alcoa CorporationAAALF · Aareal Bank AGAABKF · Aareal Bank AGAAGIY · AIA Group LimitedAAL · American Airlines Group AAPL · Apple Inc.

HQI   All “H” companies    HR

Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.